CCMIN070902 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Cummings said that is part of the Zone 7 study. Different sections of different streams have fishery interests, habitat interests, etc. There are pros and cons of each. Ms. Dennis wanted some participation in that study by the City staff. Mr. Cummings said he is going before the Zone 7 Board in two weeks to get approval of the contract for the consultant and to set up resource committees and groups. Ms. Michelotti indicated there is a short term problem and asked if September was when the water would flow again? Mr. Cummings said September was the latest when flow would return to the creek. Between now and then, the only alternative he could see was to pump from City wells or use Hansen quarry water. The Hansen water is also being requested by Shadow Cliffs. There is a need to determine the amount of water needed and who will pay for pumping it. Mayor Pico reiterated the possible benefits of conservation. He thanked Mr. Cummings for coming to Council to answer these questions. Mary Straus, 1043 Harvest Circle, thanked the Mayor for what he is attempting to do. She asked Council to do whatever it can to save the arroyo. She said she is a regular visitor to it and felt it is one of the things that makes Pleasanton such a wonderful place to live. She sees a variety of people there every day as well as many forms of wildlife. She realized that the arroyo may have been dry in the summer thirty years ago, but that has been changed. She referred to the Mayor's suggestion about conservation and pointed out that 80% of residential water goes to landscaping. She said she would be willing to cut back usage or to pay a premium to keep the arroyo going. She felt many people felt the same way. She asked Council to do whatever is necessary to preserve the creek. She said she has spoken to staffmembers at the Department of Fish and Game and they are also concerned about the area. She felt a riparian habitat was extremely important and could not believe anyone would say it should go dry. Jennifer Hosterman, 2922 Chardonnay Drive, praised Randy Lum and indicated she had enjoyed working with him. He will be missed. She agreed the arroyo is a unique riparian habitat and felt it was on the brink of a major environmental disaster. She believed this situation was the fault of Zone 7 because it did not have the foresight to predict this situation. She felt this was a question of public trust. Navigable and unnavigable waters are to be preserved for public use and the state is responsible for protecting the public's right to use them. She believed this was also a duty of the state to protect people's common heritage of streams, lakes, marshlands and tidelands. She believed Zone 7 was required by statute to take public interest into account. She said there are also laws regulating the use of waterways with downstream fisheries. She had contacted the Alameda Creek Alliance as well as Friends of the Arroyos and referred to attempts to remove dams throughout the area to allow the return of native steelhead trout, which is a threatened native species. Evidence has been found which shows the steelhead are returning to Alameda Creek for spawning. She cited case law which requires sufficient water to allow downstream spawning. She then referred to the original permit for Del Valle in 1956 which contained a provision that no diversion of water could be allowed without the approval of the Pleasanton City Council Special Meeting Minutes 16 07/09/02