CCMIN061802 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Ayala supported Mr. Rose using the property for dry farming, but had questions about the cost of intensely preparing the soil. She pointed out that the Task Force recommendations for the Specific Plan had included temporary uses of the vacant portions. She supported accepting any business plan with an agricultural use that the City would not have to pay for. She believed it would be several years before the Bemal property is fully utilized. She hypothesized that there may be some group that would develop a plan for a community garden that would not have to be maintained by the city. Ms. Michelotti asked if that was covered by the planned uses for this area? She felt decisions would have to be on a case-by-case basis. She noted the problems with dust control in dry farming uses. She had concerns about access to the property and possible safety issues. She had no problem considering any agricultural uses in the short tenn. She wanted to see some green in that area and to proceed with the meadow concept. She acknowledged that there is not enough funding to make improvements at this time, but if uses are handled on a case-by-case basis, it makes sense. Ms. McKeehan expressed concern that there could be public expectation that a particular agricultural use would continue into the future. Ms. Dennis agreed that other communities have had that experience. Once a community garden is established as a temporary use, the perception is that it should remain permanently. Ms. McKeehan agreed the case-by-case process was a good way to proceed. She felt a continuing issue would be access. She also felt people should be aware that there is no water available. She felt it would not be advisable to pick something off the list of proposed uses and allow it to go forward. Ms. Dennis felt the staffreport set forth the options very well. The first farming to consider is dry farming, however the issue with that is the dust problem. She hoped there would be a way to mitigate that. Mr. Wolfe said that would be discussed with any proposed user of the property. He indicated staff would consider any use that does not require water. Ms. Dennis acknowledged the need for soil preparation. She said only certain plants will grow in unprepared soil and she did not want plants like thistles on this property. It would make access to the property difficult and once those weeds are established it is very hard to get rid of them. Meadows need to be maintained even though they look very natural. She inquired if grazing by various types of livestock had been considered. That is compatible with wildflower development and would help manage the thistles. She suggested working with the East Bay Regional Park District to develop a mini-urban grazing program. Her neighbor grazes sheep and the other neighbors have no problem with that. Ms. Ayala wanted to be certain Council did not take an action at this meeting that would preclude an action from the Specific Plan. She had no project in mind and agreed with the P leasanton City Council 12 06/18/02 Minutes