CCMIN060402 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. McKeehan said what the City has said in the past is that for an affordable housing project, if it were an apartment project like the Promenade, or a Ridgeview Commons, that kind of project the City could build. Now Greenbriar is taking the position that it has to be 100%, which seems a little extreme. In any event, the point this evening is until you have a project that is defined, the City may not know the answer to the question. Ms. Michelotti said that even if it were a senior housing project, like a Ridgeview Commons, then that would be affordable housing in perpetuity. There would be no question on that. Ms. McKeehan said that would be the City's assessment also. Ms. Ayala said her point is that if this goes to the voters, there will be uncertainty as to affordable housing. There is no definition. She said she then started to think about the fact that there is really not any definition about any of the other uses either and she felt like the City was jumping the gun. The Mayor asked for public comment. Bruce Fiedler, 251 Kottinger, said he has addressed City Council many times as an advocate of affordable housing and senior housing and as an advocate for City parks. He enjoys many of the parks of the City, named the parks that the City presently maintains. He noted that there are regional parks on both sides of the community and the available use of the fields of the Pleasanton Unified School District. In addition to these, Pleasanton should have one really big park. In this concept he sees 200 acres of Oak and Madrone and Buckeye trees and trails with great views of Mt. Diablo. In recognition of our early California Heritage it should be named Augustine Bemal Park. Pleasanton is a fortunate community because we already have that park, with those mature trees and trails and the historic name. Just as Golden Gate Park, which has been noted in many of the recent discussions, has 20 different facilities and uses, it seems that some of this acreage within the Beruai Property can be invested in many ways to meet the critical needs of our community. If San Francisco can put a sewage plant into Golden Gate Park, on the south end by the windmill, Pleasanton can certainly transplant an ACE station, a YMCA, some elder housing, a cultural center, and recreational uses into this site and have it come out looking great. This would be a responsible plan that is truly sensitive to the many different needs of this entire community. He recently visited Los Angeles and upon returning he read in a local paper a story about a proposal to replace some of the 188 units of affordable housing that would be lost with 86 units on the Busch Property. He previously noted to City Council that the idea of segregating a group of seniors out on the road to the local dump, in an area without shopping and services or public transportation, might not be a great idea. If the proposed rents of $761 are correct, that might not be such a good idea, either, because not one person who now lives at Pleasanton Gardens, nor at Kottinger Place, would be able to afford the rents at that level. If Councilmembers want it to be really affordable for low-income seniors, you need to have the land contributed. This might have to be within a park and he suggests the Pleasanton City Council 12 06/04/02 Minutes