My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030502
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN030502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
3/27/2002 8:43:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/5/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
it would lose its special atmosphere. Regarding the two apartment complexes previously <br />mentioned, she felt these are working people with children who may not be aware of the issues. <br /> <br />Martha Morse, 5130 Case Avenue, believed everything has been said. <br /> <br />There being no other speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />There was a break at 9:24 p.m. <br /> <br />The meeting reconvened at 9:34 p.m. <br /> <br /> Council determined it would take straw votes on the primary Specific Plan-related issues <br />as set forth in the staff report. <br /> <br />(2E) Downtown public restrooms <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Ayala, seconded by Mr. Campell, to approve public restrooms <br />in the downtown area with the number and location to be determined later. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Campbell, and Vice Mayor Dennis <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: Councilmember Michelotti and Mayor Pico <br /> <br />(2G) Extension of Train Service to Downtown (Niles Canyon Railway) <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell indicated he had read all the information and had conversations with many <br />people. He did not support bringing the train downtown, but would support it as far as Junipero. <br />He had concerns about its operation and the comments from the Sunol residents were <br />enlightening. The ballot measure said it would be at no cost to the City, yet the PLA talks about <br />getting funding through grants. He has taken runs on the Corridor and feels it would be a major <br />expense for such a large operation. He felt a major capital outlay would be needed and referred <br />to one part of the Corridor which needs erosion repairs. He firmly supported trails and was <br />uncertain trails could co-exist with the trains. <br /> <br /> Mr. Iserson indicated that if there is an inclinitation to bring the train to Junipero, more <br />study is necessary. It is possible physically to fit a trail and train within the Corridor, but it is a <br />question as to how best to do it to make it a satisfactory experience for hikers, train users and <br />those around it. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell referred to the PDA request for an 18 month study and asked who would <br />pay for it? If the PDA pays for it, what kind of study would it be? Would it be necessary to have <br />another EIR. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 14 03/05/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.