My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN011502
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN011502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
3/1/2002 9:58:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN011502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
petitions at various locations and she has collected 832 signatures of people who enthusiastically <br />supported a park. She described the park she would like to see on this property. <br /> <br /> Brace Fiedler, 251 Kottinger Drive, urged Council to ratify a plan to have at least five <br />acres of senior housing at a single site convenient to transportation, shopping, and other services. <br />He also wanted ten acres for housing affordable to Pleasanton's workforce, at sites sprinkled <br />throughout the area. The community is running out of places that are economical to develop and <br />build, and convenient to schools and services. He urged Council not to miss this golden <br />opportunity. <br /> <br /> Chuck Cole, 787 Sylvaner Drive, expressed his appreciation for the work of the Task <br />Force. He felt the first thing that will be seen when one turns off Main Street is a twelve acre <br />parking lot and he preferred to have something green at that comer. An arts facility would be <br />better and it could be designed to be very attractive. He referred to the drainage creek between <br />the park and the station that could be beautified as part of the arts facility. He felt a single entry <br />to the parking lot for the station would be a detriment. If it were moved farther south, closer to <br />Valley Avenue, it would be possible to have three entries. <br /> <br /> Charlotte Severin, 4513 Mirador Drive, commended Marilyn Kane for her presentation <br />regarding Lithia Park. Council has an opportunity to develop many wonderful things on the <br />jewel of Pleasanton. She commended the Task Force for its work. She indicated she was <br />speaking for herself, Rudy Johnson and the Pleasanton Art League. She referred to a statewide <br />survey that found the public's value and support of the arts is significantly higher than previously <br />thought. The public feels the arts are vitally important to education and the economy and there is <br />widespread support for expanded funding of the arts. She said 78% of those surveyed were <br />willing to pay $5.00 more in state taxes if the money goes directly to the arts; 81% believed the <br />arts improve the academic performance of children (she related an incident from her experience <br />in teaching art in schools); 90% believe the state government should play a role in arts funding; <br />and 91% believe the arts are as important if not more important than sports. She said the <br />placement of arts facilities as proposed is not good. They need to be visible, accessible, and in <br />walking distance to town, especially for the performing arts. She agreed with moving the train <br />station farther south and placing the arts facilities in its place. <br /> <br /> Dave Wright, 5331 Northway Road, agreed with the repositioning of the arts center near <br />downtown. He felt it would be good for the downtown vitality. He said that for each dollar <br />spent at a performing arts facility $11.00 is spent in the community. He urged Council to think <br />about connecting the facilities with nice walking paths to downtown. He pointed out that the <br />Civic Arts Commission had unanimously voted to keep the arts center close to Bemal Avenue <br />and as close to downtown as possible. <br /> <br /> Maureen Dompe, 4411 Newman Place, agreed with the previous speakers. She had voted <br />to purchase the property and to keep the housing off it, but she agreed there are many needs in <br />the City. However, she was concerned about the amount of land being set aside for the school <br />facility, which may not be needed. That seems to be dictating placement of many other facilities, <br />such as the arts center and the train station. If you want to place an arts center on Bemal, but not <br />have it be a structure blocking the views, it could be set back. She suggested reconfiguring the <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 15 01 / 15/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.