My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN020502
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN020502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
3/1/2002 9:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/5/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN020502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
during the EIR analysis, the traffic consultant concluded that a roundabout or five-way <br />intersection would worsen traffic conditions. So the Committee recommended retaining the <br />existing intersection configuration with synchronized traffic signals. The City traffic engineer <br />has indicated that based on additional traffic information, a five-way signal would be feasible <br />and the Committee supports the staff recommendation. With respect to the Parks and <br />Commission recommendations, the Committee concurs with the staff recommendations, <br />although the Committee did recommend that the Veterans' Hall and Museum buildings be <br />redesignated for commercial. It was felt that that was consistent with efforts to provide the <br />maximum degree of economic vitality in the area, but would not take away from the public uses <br />of the buildings. Regarding the downtown public restrooms, she deferred to the Council's <br />discretion. Regarding the extension of Rose Avenue, traffic analysis could take place without <br />causing a deterioration of traffic impacts in the downtown area or the residential area. Lastly, <br />with regard to the proposal for the Niles Canyon Railroad, the Committee spent all its efforts <br />during the first four months of this process to this matter. As a result of those meetings, input <br />was provided to staff, who, with the assistance of the Pleasanton Locomotive Association <br />(PLA), came up with five alternatives. Those alternatives were reviewed as part of the <br />environmental impact report (EIR) and as a result, the Committee determined that because of <br />parking problems, traffic impacts, potential air quality deterioration, and noise nuisances, the <br />train would not be an appropriate land use in the downtown area. Although the Committee did <br />leave open the option for a railroad terminus south of Bemal Avenue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if the Committee had discussed the Arroyo and emphasis on it in the <br />Ray Street area. She felt a vision was needed for the area. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hardy said there were discussions about the Arroyo and the desire for a trail system <br />in the area. Ultimately, the conclusion was reached that because the banks were so steep, for <br />safety and liability concerns, and neighborhood desires, it was recommended that the 325 Ray <br />Street site be used for residential. She referred to the recommendations of the Pleasanton <br />Downtown Association and said they were in agreement with the Committee's recommendations <br />with the exception of a recommendation to extend consideration of the train option for an <br />additional 18 months. The Specific Plan Committee has spent an exhaustive amount of time <br />along with staff and it felt the train matter has been studied thoroughly. The Task Force stands <br />by its recommendations. <br /> <br /> Pamela Stoddard, Executive Director of the Pleasanton Downtown Association (PDA), <br />stated that from all the discussions it is obvious the downtown is a key component to the quality <br />of life in Pleasanton. She appreciated the efforts and commitments of the citizens involved in the <br />Specific Plan process. Last September, the PDA Board of Directors adopted seven action items <br />developed from components of the draft Specific Plan. These items provided direction for <br />revitalization efforts. They are: 1. Acquire the Alameda County Transportation Corridor for <br />parking, improving the entrance to Main Street and the Niles Canyon Train. 2. Improve parking <br />in the commercial area. 3. Create a new southern Main Street gateway to downtown to make it <br />easier for people to find downtown and bring people to the businesses. 4. Maintain and enhance <br />the architecture of downtown. 5. Encourage first floor retail. 6. Improve downtown navigation <br />with signages, kiosks, etc. 7. Increase downtown pedestrian activity. She believed these were <br />all in line with the recommendations for the Specific Plan with the exception of two key points. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 8 02/05/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.