My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060501
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN060501
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:33 AM
Creation date
7/20/2001 3:37:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/5/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN060501
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r~ad by title ~ and waiving further reading thereof, to prezone the Simonl property <br />southerly of the new Vineyard Avenue to "PUD-Vineyard District"; and to introduce <br />Ordinance No. 1834, to be read by title only and waiving further readino~ thereof, <br />aliproving the application of Centex Homes, as flied under Case PUD-06, subject to the <br />canditians set forth in the staff report, the memorandum from the Plannin~ Director dated <br />May 21, 2001, and the additional conditions that the side yard fencing be five feet solid with <br />one foot of lattice; a 100 foot setback be required for any building or play area from the <br />60ky power line; the lot line be adjusted to allow sufficient room for the day care center; <br />and the Roberts' driveway be twenty feet. <br /> <br />~ roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Campbell, Dennis, Micheiotti, and Mayor Pico <br />NOES: None <br />A~SENT: None <br />AIISTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico was not happy with what was being done to the ridgeline, but an agreement <br />w~s made when the Specific Plan was adopted and he felt it was important to honor that <br />commim~ent. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti commented that ten years ago she saw a plan for the Vineyard Corridor <br />thst included 750 homes, which she strongly opposed. She felt this development will be <br />something the community can be proud of. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis thanked everyone on the Planning Commission and staff that have worked so <br />hard on this project. She felt every aspect was considered, the architecture is attractive and this <br />is the best project possible. In some respects, she felt this will actually improve the visual <br />asl~Cts of the Vineyard Corridor. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala pointed out that infrastructure on these parcels is extremely expensive and <br />without all the various developers and the School District cooperating, the plan would not have <br />worked. She felt it was in the City's best interests to cooperate, even though Council was <br />compromising on what it really wanted for the ridgeline area. This plan ties Ruby Hill to <br />Pleasanton beautifully. <br /> <br />Itegl 6d <br />A~]optioa of th~ Youth Master Plan of Pleasanton. (SR 01:124) <br /> <br />James W. Wolfe presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis noted that even though the Parks and Community Sendces Depath~lent has <br />the prinmry role of implementing and monitoring the master plan, the plan spreads far into the <br />community and she wanted make cer~dn that it remains a living document. She wanted to <br />continue the inter-depat h~lental cooperation and asked how the status reports on implementation <br />would come back to Council. <br /> <br />Pl~asanton City Council 17 06/05/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.