My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060501
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN060501
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:33 AM
Creation date
7/20/2001 3:37:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/5/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN060501
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
like to have seen the open space management plan for this area. He believed the secondary units <br />would not be affordable housing, but would instead be home offices or play rooms. He <br />suggested the houses on the upper level be one story so there would not be so much grading. He <br />was concerned about the dump trucks hauling dirt going by his driveway. A major concern of <br />his was the shared well with the Chrismans. In addition, he was concerned about the increased <br />ftre danger from the new houses next to the open space. He noted the new development would <br />have fire hydrants and he does not have one near his home. He asked Council to impose <br />mitigations to deal with his concerns and to ask that the Chrismans or the developer pay to put a <br />new well on the Chrismans' property, so he doesn't have to share anymore. <br /> <br /> Chris Schiies, 699 Peters Avenue #B, representing the Chrismans, said the Vineyard <br />Avenue Specific Plan contemplates agricultural irrigation needs being met by private wells. The <br />size of pipe required to bring City water to the area is adequate for residential use only. He <br />believed the shared well has worked fine and according to the well logs, the standing water level <br />is the same today or slightly higher than in the past. The well has never gone dry or ceme close. <br />It is unknown whether a well on the Chrisman property would be successful. He spoke to <br />someone who drills Wells and that person said it was difficult to find an aquifer in the Vineyard <br />Corridor area. He referred to the effective date of the resolution emending the specific plan. If <br />the proposed project does not go forward, the Chrismans felt the next developer might be able to <br />make 12 lots work on their property. He proposed the effective date of the specific plan <br />amendment be the date of the recordation of the final map. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala asked if he was saying the Chrismans were not in favor of a private well. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schlies replied that they were not and there was doubt that water could be found. <br />The costs are from $25,000 to $60,000 to drill and it may turn out to be dry. <br /> <br /> Mary Roberts, 1666 Vineyard Avenue, indicated PG&E installed the 60ky line three or <br />four years ago with no notice to the City. She doubted PG&E would be enthusiastic about <br />changing this newly installed line. When they were installed there were roaming power outages <br />in the area and it is not a simple thing to move a line. She felt moving the power line was far <br />more difficult than moving the day care center. She commented that her well is not very good. <br />She had to drill 600 feet and it is barely functioning. It cost her $16,000 ten years ago. <br /> <br /> Allen Roberts, 27 Grey Eagle Court, indicated he shares two thousand feet of common lot <br />line with the Berlogars. Most of this project does not affect him, except for the relocation of the <br />caretaker home and the dedication of the new trail on the joint property line. He agrees with <br />both of those things, but asked Council not to open the trail for public use until it is complete to <br />its destination. <br /> <br /> Para Chrisman, 1944 Vineyard Avenue, said they have an excellent well that has never <br />caused trouble. She had an estimate for a new well which was $10,000 for three hundred feet. <br />The $60,000 quote was probably if there were rocks and shale that had to be drilled through. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell asked if she supported the compromise for sharing the well that was <br />proposed by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 12 06/05/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.