CCMIN032001 - Laserfiche WebLink

understanding that the other funding developers would reimburse them in conjunction with their projects. Ms. Michelotti then said we are all Pleasanton residents. When the North Sycamore Specific Plan was approved, those properties were brought into the city, including this property. New Cities' proposal was the next step (past Greenbriar) in getting the golf course and a bypass road to it. Mr. Campbell said Mr. Bates has agreed to pay for water, sewer, road and permits for the golf course. How does the City make certain he will do what he verbally agreed to? Mr. Roush said there is a written agreement that must be signed before the final map can be approved for New Cities. Any other agreement would be required to be signed before the final map is approved. Mr. Campbell believed the issues were separate. If you approve a project, you should approve it based on the merits of the project. Ms. Ayala indicated Council is also interested in affordable housing. Council has adopted an inclusionary zoning ordinance. This project opens itself up to adding conditions and she wanted staff to bring back conditions for this project regarding inclusionary housing, school fees and any other new conditions imposed since the original approval of the project. She said she never would have approved this project without the link to the golf course. She wanted time for staff to bring back conditions. Mr. Campbell asked staff for verification that Council could go back and add new conditions. Mr. Roush said there is a tentative map application and by reason of the appeal, Council can impose new conditions if it so desires. Ms. Ayala was certain the golf course permits would come back very soon and the annexation election could be held. All this would then be a moot point. She wanted staffto have time to bring this project up to date with conditions. She asked to continue the item for that reason. Ms. Michelotti referred to all the work with the neighbors. The original plan was 62 units and now it is 48. If you want affordable housing, it will increase the density and the neighborhood may not want that. That was not addressed in the prior public hearing. Ms. Dennis felt she knew what the neighbors want. They did not object to the fundamental project. She felt the interests of the neighborhood can be consolidated; the people who want water and sewer want the project to go ahead and the only issue is the connection to the golf course. Now with the inclusionary housing ordinance and with Ms. Ayala's suggestion, she was not sure Council was doing the neighborhood any favors Pleasanton City Council 21 03/20/01 Minutes