Laserfiche WebLink
any questions about the design. Mr. Antrim said there were several neighborhood <br />meetings at which they tried to address concems. Fifty-eight new trees will be planted. <br />He urged Council to approve the plan as the Planning Commission did unanimously. <br /> <br /> Timothy Bowe, ARC, Inc., 940 Tyler Street, Suite 23, Benicia, reviewed the <br />design features of the building. He explained that the highest point of the building is 35 <br />feet, which is similar to many two story houses. There had been discussion about <br />mitigating the view of the building by lowering the building pad and he explained that <br />this building will be viewed not only by the residents behind the building, but also by <br />thousands of people driving on Sunol Boulevard. He believed that sinking it into a hole <br />would be counterproductive to the presentation that was intended. He believed this was a <br />building with a contemporary design, but also one that will age well and continue to look <br />good and not be dated with the passage of time. <br /> <br /> Michael Robertson, 4222 Remillard Court, another of the partners in the building, <br />indicated he was very proud of this building and hoped to be a tenant in the building. <br /> <br /> Brad Hirst, 1811 Santa Rita Road, indicated he had brought up the idea of a berm <br />along Diamond Court. The City's landscape architect does not recommend a berm under <br />the eucalyptus tree. He indicated if Council wants a berm from the eucalyptus to the <br />eastern property line, he would be happy to do that. One of the conditions of the <br />Planning Commission was that the trees be 24 inch box as opposed to 15 gallon sized and <br />he agreed to do that. In addition a request was made to plant the trees early in <br />construction rather than later and he agreed to that. The City's landscape architect, the <br />applicant's horticulturalist and landscape architect all reconunend not berming under the <br />eucalyptus and not planting any shrubs under it. With regard to the lowered building pad, <br />he believed the occupants of the ground floor offices would not be pleased. He referred <br />to the berm at 7901 Stoneridge and indicated the view was not good and that berm was a <br />lot farther away than it would be in his proposed building. For the occupants, he asked <br />that no berm or retaining wall be required at the front of the building. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico declared the public heating open. <br /> <br /> Dolores Bengtson, 568 Hamilton Way, indicated she lives around the comer from <br />the subject property. She believed this project will enhance the entrance to Pleasanton. <br />She had confidence the City planning staff would require the project to meet all <br />applicable standards, but she was more concerned about whether the project owners <br />could address the concerns of the neighborhood in a fair and reasonable manner. She <br />wanted the architecture and landscaping to enhance the neighborhood and be <br />complimentary to Sunol Boulevard. She also wanted the allowable uses on the site to be <br />compatible with the neighborhood. She believes this project has met or exceeded her <br />expectations. It is a beautiful building and the landscaping is lush and covers 40% of the <br />property. She was opposed to lowering the building pad and felt like the building will <br />look like it is in a hole. With regard to the berm, she felt that was a concern of the <br />adjacent property owners and not hers. If it helps them, she supported it. She urged <br />Council to support the project as submitted. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 5 02/20/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />