CCMIN110700 - Laserfiche WebLink

also Policy 66 which indicates the Arroyo dei Valle is an underutilized natural and COmmunity amenRy whose access, use, and appreciation should be enhanced. One way to enhance it is to create a plsT~ access at the Main Sweet green near the bridge. Part D of Policy 66 encourages outdoor dining overlooking the Arroyo. He end his client mentioned that earlier and suggested that if the mobile home park is vacated, there could be something like the Shadowbrook Lodge in Capitola constructed there. He askcd Council to consider all these points. Frank O'Neill, 4716 Saginaw Circle, spoke in support of Mr. Cielsielski and encouraged Council to sell the property to him. Joe Devane, 7080 DonIon Way, Suite 122, Dublin, attorney for Mr. Cielsielski, encouraged Council to stick to the process and just determine if the property is surplus or not. The decision of who is goes to was made in April 1999. All these arguments have been made before and rejected. Howard Neely, 448 Amador, indicated he had reviewed the property and related the difficulty in getting to the property. He felt the area was useless for any public purpose. He owns property on St. Mary's Creek and indicated that property owners own to the center of the creek with a ten foot easement along the creek which is owned by the City. No such condition exists along the Arroyo del Valle. There are no easements there end he further related other anomalies of ownership in the area. He believed this was excess property and it should be returned to Mr. Ciesielski. Philip Ciesielski, 4160 Stanley Boulevard, indicated a decision had been made in April 1999, but then the property was referred to various Committees for review. He spoke to each Committee. At one committee meeting, someone asked why this has taken so long. His grandmother waited over thirty years to get this property back and has now passed away. He asked Council to finally take aclion and declare this property surplus and adhere to the decision made in April 1999 to return the property to his family. Pat Murray, 4470 Mirador Drive, thanked Council for listening to individuals and acting on individual requests. The being no further speslcers, Mayor Tarver closed the public hearing. It was moved by Mayor Tarver, seconded by Ms. Miehelot~, to approve the staff recommendation with an additional condition that no residential structures be built on the property. Ms. Michelotti a.~ked if there could be a lot line adjustment to make this one parcel. She felt if the parcels remained two lots there would be a conflict if the restriction on building was imposed. Pleasanton City Council Minutes 10 11/07/00