CCMIN071800 - Laserfiche WebLink

(99 market rate and 20 duets). T~e apartment project was reduced from 120 to 100 traits (20 low income [50% affordability], 11 moderate income [100%] and 69 market rate units). There are a total of 425 market rate units tbr sale. There are also ten ducts in the 6000 sq. ft. lots. He indicated 40 second units could be built over selected detached garages. Alternative 7B removes the apartments and the units are substituted by 4000 sq. ft. lots on the central parcel. There are then 527 units (76 for sale below market units). Alternative 7C moves the apartments to south of the commercial area and rearranges some of the housing~ Ms. Michelotti requested more open space in the plaza area for the apartments. Mayor Tarver asked what a plan would resemble if housing was taken from the central parcel and moved to the west side to make up for what was taken off the west side before. Mr. Costanzo said about 55 units. Ms. Ayala asked why the parcels on the east side have to be 5000 sq. ft. What is necessary lbr the company to build more houses on smaller lots and still make money? Mr. Costaro said about 200-220 lots. He then described drawings for several other alternatives. Alternative 8A was similar to 7A but has 77 lots on the east parcel and more lots on the west parcel. Alternative 8B has no apartments but with the same 77 lots on east parcel and 37 on the west parcel and the same eonfigumrion in the central parcel. Alternative 9 describes what happens if nothing is allowed on the east parcel with more housing on the west and central parcels. To summarize, he said all the Alternative 7's are what has been worked out with staff if the environmental permit can be obtained. The Alternative 8's are if wider setbacks are necessary on the eastam parcel. The last scenario, Alternative 9, is if nothing can be put on the east parcel. He requested Council to concentrate on Alternatives 7A, B. and C and decide what direction should be taken with regarding to location and type of housing. Mr. Roush stated the way the Specific Plan and/or the PUD would be presented would be a series of fall back positions for approval. For example, Council could approve development of a certain number of units on the eastam parcel and the plan would provide that if the environmental permits were not obtained within a certain period of time, then the developer would fall back to a fewer number of units on the eastern parcel, and if permits can still not be obtained, then there would be no development on the eastern parcel and the development on the central and western parcels would be allowed, as in Alternative 9. In that way, Greenbriar would not be required to come back to Council each and every time. Pleasanton City Council I5 07/18/00 Minutes