CCMIN082100 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Tarvet asked about the minimum side yard set back. Mr. Swift said there was about twenty feet between the houses on the 12,000 sq. fi. lots. Mr. Costanzo indicated Greenbriar agreed with the Bemal Specific Plan, the CEQA findings, rezonings and prezonings of the site, the PUD development plan, the Preannexation Development Agreement, Growth Management Agreement and Affordable Housing Agreement as staff has recommended. There were three items of concern (#13, #14 and #15), which have since been taken care of. One issue on ~vhich Greenbriar did not agree dealt with the txaffic circle locations and the number required. He reviewed the monetary contributions Greenbriar is giving to the City and asked Council to support the project. Ms. Michelolti requested clarification on Parcel l. Mr. Swift explained the new Lot I as described in the addendum staff report. He also clarified condition 38d regarding location of abandoned wells. Mr. Pico asked what the potential assessed value of the property would be at build out and the property tax revenue that would come to the City of Pleasanton. Mr. Costanzo believed the assessed value would be between $400 and $500 million. Ms. Acosta indicated the city would receive about $300,000 annually. There was a break at 9:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:52 p.m. Ms. Dennis expressed appreciation lbr the commtmily's interest in this project. She expressed concern that the staff reports for the August 21 meeting were not available until Friday, August 18, and the staff reports for the press and public were not available until Saturday or Sunday. Further information was still being delivered Sunday. She believed Council was being rushed. She understood that Mayor Willie Brown and Greenbriar were happy about the final project, but she was not certain the City of Pleasanton should be happy. She asked Council to respond to her concerns before voting on the project. She did not I~el the public had an opportunity to be informed with documentation for the plan and the development agreement. There has been a lot of discussion about the various alternatives. She understood there are 24 months before a decision between Alternative A or B must be made, but the development agreement permits the applicant to begin processing either alternative at any time. Another of her concerns involved the dispute resolution procedure which states only the applicant had the fight of appeal. She believed the public had a part in the appeals process. Regarding the design of the project and what is being accepted on the public parcel, she was Plcasanton City Council 5 08/21/00 Minutes