CCMIN082800 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Michelotti asked if the park had m be located in the area set forth on the drawing presented to Council. Mr. Swift said no. The drawing is only a concept. The public process will decide where the park will be located. It could be anywhere in the central parcel and still comply with the Specific Plan and the EIR. Mayor Tarvet referred to the mention of 600 units in the documents and wanted it clear that only 581 units are appmved. He wanted pages 3-9 and page 3-13 to be mended to set forth 581 units maximum. He asked for an explanation of the development of both the park and the golf coarse. He was concerned that Council may be tying that to Phase II because of the wording of the first guideline (4.1) that says "it will be developed with attention to impacts on adjoining uses and incorporation of mitigation measures under the EIR and relation of potential rutore uses of Phase II to be located around it." tie believed that appeared to say that Council must know what Phase I1 uses will be around the park and golf course before they are developed. He reiterated his desire to see the park go through planning and development as quickly as possible. Mr. Swift. indicated stall' did not intend to link the park to Phase II at 'all other than the fact that there is an EIR mitigation measure that discusses the relationship of uses to adjoining uses. Staff falt incorporating that concept was reasonable and included it in the guidelines. A good example would be that while looking for the appropriate location of the fiP, y acre park, that the Council be cognizant that there is a potential ACE train station on the list of potential uses. But those uses do not have to be decided upon before proceeding with the community park. Mayor Tarver asked staff how it would proceed to decide the Phase II uses, the park and the golf course. Ms. Acosta indicated a report will come to Council at its second meeting in September. Typically, the Park and Recreation Comntission would form a task force and prepare a master plan. At the same time, there is a San Francisco Task Force that has been formed to review proposed public uses. it is suggested that members of those two bodies work together on this process. Mayor Tarver wanted a discussion oftimelines included in that report. Ms. Acosta indicated that pining a park of this size takes time. Ms. Ayala appreciated the inclusion of members of the San Francisco Task Force in this planning process. Mayor Tarver referred to the linking of the three-acre parcel purchase with the Preannexation Development Agreement. He did not think they were linked in any way. Pleasanton City Council 3 08/28/00 Minutes