CCMIN081500 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Michelotti asked if the Conditions of Approval, which were previously distributed, would be changed. If they were, she requested a redlined copy to make the changes clear. Ms. Dennis requested an estimate of the cost of park developmere and maintenance on the western parcel, if it is not used for a golf course, and an update regarding Greenbriar's negotiations with the School District. Patrick Costanzo, Jr., Senior Vice Present of Grecnbriar Homes, reviewed the drawings prepared after the last workshop. The preferred plan by Council and Greenbriar was 7A (581 total units 100 aparm~ems off the Village Commons [.9 ac.] including 31 Below Market Rate units: an office complex of 745,000 sq. ec. composed of eight office buildings; alley-loaded homes on the Central Parcel [neo-traditional design with from porches and pedestrian friendly]; West Parcel - two residential eomm~mities[6,000-sq. Pc. lots and 12,000 sq.ft. lots], a five-acre park, open space surrounding the residemial development; East Parcel 5000 sq. ft. residential lots). Plan 7B1 was devised to rcallocate 37 residential units from the East Parcel to the Central Parcel. Plan 7C1 is the alternative if no units would be allowed on the East Parcel. The residential units would be moved to the area south of the commercial development, away from the freeway and along the west side of the Valley Avenue extension. Mayor Tarvcr and Ms. Ayala strongly snpported Altemative 7A, but if traits had to be moved from the East Parcel, they wanted them immediately south of the commercial area and closer to the freeway, not added into part of the Central Parcel. They did not want to consider Alternative 7B1 at all, Ms. Michelotti inquired abom the need for a soundwall if the houses are placed south of the commercial area. Mr. Costanzo stated that all of the alternatives would require a soundwall or berm tbr noise mitigation. Regarding the East Parcel, he stated the biologist believes there is a 90% chance the units will be allowed. If some accommodation is necessary, he did not believe it was necessary to remove all units, as in Alternative 7C 1. Mayor Tarver believed that Council will approve 581 units and if some modification in the location of the units is necessary, that can come back to Council later. Ms. Michelotti preferred Altemative 7A, but if some units had to be moved li'om the Eastern Parcek then they should be moved on to the Central Parcel and then south of the cormmemial area. She did not want units added to the Western Parcel. Mr. Pico believed that adding a third row of residential units around the apartments would impact the view of the ridge. He preferred moving all the housing units off the East parcel closer to the frccway. Pleasanton City Cotmcil 5 08/15/00 Minutes