My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN062000
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCMIN062000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:32 AM
Creation date
8/8/2000 6:53:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/20/2000
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN062000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approve participation in anticus curiae brief in support of the County- of Sonoma <br />concerning the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund's shiPt of local agency's <br />property tax revenues to fund education. (SR00:168) <br /> <br /> Robert Cordtz, 262 W. Angcla, Pleasanton, urged the Council to not vote in favor <br />of Item 4k. Mr. Cordtz believed that Council is singling out one organization and felt <br />that this was unfair. Many civic and religious organizations have contributed to the ~vell <br />being of Pleasanton. The City is already in the middle of a study costing $150,000 to <br />$200,000. There has been a committee in place to do this for two years and this <br />cormmittee has already looked at changing the name and voted it down. Citizens have <br />approached the Park and Recreation Cormnission to get approval, and the vote was 3 - 2 <br />against the idea. He suggested waiting for the completion of the Downtown Specific <br />Plan. The future is not predictable concerning whether or not this park is going to be <br />eliminated. He hoped that Council would vote to wait until the Specific Plan is finalized <br />and these things would be ironed out at that time. <br /> <br /> Roger McLain, 1787 Beachwood Way, Plcasanton, spoke on behalf of Item 4k. <br />He was bothered by the fact that, without saying anything to the Lions Club or their <br />efti~n, the information just presented for not changing the park name's was incorrect. He <br />was bothered because their comments were brought forth at such a late time. He stated <br />lhta he is on the Downtown Specific Plan Committee and has worked hard to evaluate the <br />railroad options that were presented on the area. The Park and Recreation Commission <br />has evaluated the request to change the name. He has looked at the records and Wayside <br />Park was never nanred as such by the Council. It became known as Wayside Park as a <br />directive of where to go. When DeLuca and Wayside Parks were created, the <br />Policeman's Association asked if one of the parks could be named for one of <br />Pleasanton's first Police Chiefs. The City Council then formally named the park DeLuca, <br />but nothing was done with what is known as Wayside, The Lions Club created the parks. <br />Consequently, after the parks were established, the City decided to buy the property for <br />the small sum of $400,000. The Lions Club ~vants recognition lbr what it has done in the <br />community and, more importantly, the name Lions is importm~t so that people know that <br />the club exist and where they can come for certain types of help. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti stated that the l,ions were originally instrumental in securing the <br />park land. <br /> <br />There were no further comments from the public. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Miehelottl, seconded by Mr. Pieo, that the Consent <br />Items be approved. <br /> <br />Pleasunion City Council 4 06/20/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.