Laserfiche WebLink
sign rules that would benefit the town as a whole. Nothing like that has happened for <br />other parts of the city. It sounds like once again, they are in an evolution in difl~rcnt <br />parts of the town and we are trying to get those parts to grow and be productive. Perhaps <br />something can be taken out of what was done before to be placed in the new areas. <br />Obviously there have been a lot of wonderful success stories in downtown. There is no <br />magic formula outside of dedication and hard work and evaryone is always looking Ibr <br />solntions and teamwork to get those things done. But there have also been some other <br />areas that we need to look at. Businesses in the 300 block of Main Street are now gonel <br />but were there when he first came to town. While there are success stories, there are also <br />people who have not been able to make it in the downtown area. He then mentioned <br />some businesses on the other side ofto~vn that were not able to succeed. He is sure these <br />people put their hard-earned dollars into those locations and they were not able to <br />succeed. He said as far as signage goes it is something that evolves and changes for <br />different places for different times. lie thinks that perhaps the Council can help out in <br />that area when they look at an industry such as this. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roman had a letier from Randy Rothraan, 3440 Stanley, Pleasanton, a former <br />businessowner, dated Jtme 19, 2000, which he read into the record. <br /> <br /> '~Honorable Mayor Ben Tarver, City of Pleasanton and members of the City <br />Council," <br /> <br /> "This letter is to express my concern over the lack of comparable si~nage with <br />respect to our immediate neighbors, which are Big O Tires. Rynick Tires, and now <br />Winston Tires. As the previous tenant of Suite J and K at 3440 Stanley Boulevard, the <br />main reason for selecting the location, which has ideal visibility as a retail sales center for <br />Stanley Boulevard, Washington and California. To my surprise I was restricted to the <br />existing signage boxes allowing about 30 square feet of printed signs on the fa,/ade of the <br />building. The City Code Enfomement officers met any additional signage used "far sale" <br />and other promotions with a quick response. I was forced to remove them or face <br />citations. No one from the city was interested in helping to amend or revise the <br />restrictive signage program assigned to this complex, which is now over 25 years old, and <br />established when this was the only building in the area on Stanley Boulevard of its size. <br />It was obvious to me that no one from the city was interested in helping my business <br />succeed at this location, just having a signage display by <br /> <br /> "The lack of reasonable and justifiable signage represents the main mason for my <br />business failure at this location. I was denied the same promotions in attracting potential <br />customers off from Stanley Boulevard as a neighboring business was given, which is the <br />singular difference. Just because a building is ideally situated and highly visible as a <br />retail sales center, without the premise signage that establishes the dominant presence to <br />an area, a retail sales business is severely handicapped and most likely destined to fail. <br />This location was obviously designed as a retail sales location equal in stature and size to <br />immediately neighboring businesses that occupy sizable retail sales space. Our neighbors <br />have been afforded prominent signage on Stanley Boulevard without the expanse of the <br />Stanley Boulevard retail sales space. None have Stanley Boulevard frontage. Why <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 26 06/20/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />