My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060600
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCMIN060600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:32 AM
Creation date
8/8/2000 6:48:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/6/2000
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN060600
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Michelotti said that we have had opportunities and we have <br />~vorked on our own assisted living project for a five years but we don't have anything. <br />We don't have one project that is in the process of being built. There is one approved~ <br />but nothing has been built. This Council recently put up $250,00 for five units. That was <br />$50,000 a unit. This asks for a subsidy of $1 1,000 a unit. That is very minimal. She <br />asked if they get the tax credits, do we have the availability, with their acquiescence~ to <br />improve upon the project in the ways that, say the Housing Commission, would like to <br />do? <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian replied that as far as the tax credits go, we can certainly modify <br />certain aspects of the project and still qualify for the approval of the tax credits. <br />Flexibility is certainly an important aspect of this since fight now the project does not <br />conform with the PUD. The City has encouraged the developer to look at the entire <br />process. There is a time constraint and we are trying to work something out to strike <br />some middle Found. The reality is that if the project does not conform with the PUD, <br />which creates concerns for the tax credits, then there won't be a project. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Ayala, seconded by Councilmember <br />Dennis, to approve Resolution 00-073 to allow a waiver of the Lower Income <br />Housing Fee for Willow Partners for the Sthncridge Villas Senior Housing Project. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follo~vs: <br />AYES: Councilmember Ayala, Dennis and Michelotti <br />NOES: Councilmember Pico and Mayor Tarver <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6c <br />Proposed plan for nroceedine with Wastewater Treatment Plant and LAVWMA <br />pipeline project. (SR 00:147) <br /> <br />Randall A. Lum presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said he hoped that everybody understands what is being talked <br />about. He wanted to make it clear that we are talking about a plant expansion, a pipeline, <br />and reverse osmosis. Hc doesn't think that we want to bifurcate all of those issues and <br />talk about doing one without getting an agreement that is acceptable for the eorrm~unity <br />and the City of Pleasanton, which he doesn't believe these terms are. They have to do <br />with the smell and the odor of the treatment ponds and whether or not we would want to <br />keep that or not support the plant expansion because we want to stop reverse osmosis <br />l?om being injected into the ground water, which 72% of the community said they do not <br />want. He doesn't want to see these type of things separated because he doesn't think they <br />should be separated, nor does he want to have a 1:30 in the morning meeting with no <br />coxmnunity participation on the threat from DSRSD that if we don't do "x" than they are <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 06/06/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.