My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN041800
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CCMIN041800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:31 AM
Creation date
5/5/2000 11:30:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/18/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
bank loan to buy the property and rely on developer fees, although there may be only <br />150-300 units built each year. Mr. Moran felt that was a risky financing proposition for <br />the School District over the long term. These kinds of influences don't help the School <br />Board make prudent decisions and put together long term plans that work. Recently a <br />Planning Commissioner said there would be no more housing permits approved unless <br />there is a fourth high school. That is politics with a baseball bat. The School District is <br />the one responsible for opening the schools in the fall and providing facilities to handle <br />all the students that regismr. They have done a good job at that. He hoped the City <br />Council will keep all these considerations in mind when considering the developer fee <br />agreement and work to help the District do the best job it possible can. <br /> <br /> Vicky Reinke, 3471 Dennis Drive, indicated she has attended School Board <br />meetings and some of the School Impact Fee Committee meetings. Her concems are that <br />the financial programs of the District are kept intact and that actions are not taken that <br />will affect the ability to provide for the students. The discussion of amending the <br />facilities list on Exhibit B could lead to litigation and that could stop funding for the <br />building that was intended in 1992. There is also discussion about a fourth high school. <br />There have been many parents and teachers opposed to this and she believed that has not <br />been decided by the Board. She was concerned about putting funding in jeopardy for <br />expansion of the existing high schools. It was her understanding that the School Board <br />makes the final decision on a cash flow shortfall, but Council has an influence on the <br />decision because it is a partner in the agreement. She asked Council to listen to the <br />community before a decision is made on a cash flow shortfall and to make sure the <br />District does not lose any funding. <br /> <br /> Joseph Russo, 6772 Paseo San Leon, indicated he has been following the School <br />Board meetings and the subject of a fourth high school as well as the funding that might <br />come from developer fees. He believed the School Board should obtain funding through <br />bond measures on the ballot. To try to obtain additional funding from the relatively few <br />newcomers to the community through additional fees or costs for school facilities that <br />currently exist and a student population that currently exists seems like an odd way to <br />fund new school growth. A lot of people move into town and do not settle in new <br />developments. He reiterated his desire for a bond measure. <br /> <br /> There being no further speakers, the item was continued until after a joint session <br />closed session with the School Board. <br /> <br />Item 6c <br />Public Hearinl~ reffardin~, Weed Abatement Pro~,ram 2000. (SR 00:110) <br /> <br /> Fire Chief Stewart Gary presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> There being no speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 7 04/18/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.