Laserfiche WebLink
decision was made many years ago to control the size of the fire fighting force by <br />enacting sprinkler ordinances more restrictive than the Uniform Building Code which is <br />adopted by all the westem states and the cormtry. Issues considered were the size of a <br />fire that could occur in various sized building and it was calculated how many gallons of <br />water per minute it would take for fire hoses to put that size fire out. Gallons per minute <br />equals numbers of fire fighters. This community selected 8000 square feet of total <br />building area as the limit. Beyond that threshold, the on duty fire fighting force would <br />seriously be taxed and there would be an exposure and a threat to properties nearby. The <br />commtmity made the decision that that much volume under the roof should be fire <br />sprinklered. Administratively, with an 8000 square foot ordinance in a city in California <br />that rarely builds a basement, the reality is staff does not usually see 7900 square feet <br />buildings above grade with a basement. Also within the Uniform Building Code is the <br />provision that basements exceeding 1500 square feet should be sprinklered. That is there <br />because fighting a fire in a basement is very dangerous. Even though the people get out <br />above, there is concern about fire fighter safety. Imagine going down into a hot, smoke- <br />filled oven and finding the seat of the fire. Too many firefighters in the last hundred <br />years have been killed doing that. The Code has historically said if basements exceed a <br />certain area and have storage they must be sprinklered. If fire department staff reviewed <br />this building today as a complete submittal, sprinklers would be required for all useable <br />areas. Mr. Churka said the flammability is restricted in the basement, but that refers to <br />flammable liquids. He can still store a variety of ordinary combustibles that can still bum <br />very hot and generate a lot of smoke. The Fire Chief has to consider this building over <br />the next fifty years. Over that time new pipes or new wires may be installed in the first <br />floor and it is undetermined how completely sealed the first floor/basement fire <br />protection rating will be. Basement fires are dangerous and this is a large basement. If it <br />is going to have storage in it, it should have been sprinklered. <br /> <br /> Mr. Churka felt if he cut the basement space in half, the building would not have <br />to be sprinklered. Based on what the Fire Chief said, the building should have been <br />sprinklered from the beginning and he should have been told that before it was already <br />constructed. <br /> <br />Ms. Michelotti believed he had been told that from the beginning. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta referred to the start date of the project. Staff was trying to be helpful <br />to Mr. Churka and allowed the project to start with foundation only permits to allow the <br />process to start. That extended the building period. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked for confirmation from Mr. Churka that the 2220 square feet <br />of basement first submitted on the plans was incorrect and there is actually 3500 square <br />feet. <br /> <br /> Mr. Churka said the 3500 square feet was close but there is a difference between <br />useable space versus non-useable space. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 15 04/04/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />