Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Michelotti asked if four of the six lanes on Sunol are to be used as <br />deceleration or turning lane? <br /> <br />Mr. Korve said yes and described traffic movements. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if a traffic study had been done and how many trips currently <br />come from this site. <br /> <br /> Mr. Korve said TJKM prepared the traffic study and there are 140 trips during <br />peak hours because the facility is not being used very much. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala inquired about the connection of Valley Avenue at Sycamore. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift indicated the Valley connection at Sycamore was the result of land <br />planning done on the proposed San Francisco project on the Bernal Avenue property. <br />Studies had indicated the connection would work either at Sycamore or Junipero. <br /> <br /> Rick Valente, 5079 Haven Place, #307, Dublin, representing United Steel <br />Workers of America, indicated there is a shortage of affordable housing in the Tri-Valley <br />area. He ret~rred to a recent study by the National Low Income Housing Coalition that <br />stated families earning minimum wage cannot afford an apartment in any major city. He <br />supported including a mix of low to moderate aflbrdable housing on this site. He <br />presented a letter signed by Judy Gough from the Central Labor Council supporting <br />aftbrdable housing on the Kaiser property. He asked Council to reject the appeal of <br />Kaiser and consider a mixed use project with housing, light industrial, office and open <br />space. <br /> <br /> Larry Bartelson, 675 Hamilton Way, supported the project with no residential use. <br />He believed the main concern was traffic and condition 6 provided solutions. However, <br />he felt condition 7 was questionable. He believed a single user with a single construction <br />phase would be ideal for the project but admitted multiple users and construction phases <br />were likely. He wanted condition 7 to be amended to require that Sunol Boulevard <br />improvements would be completed along with and no later than the second phase of <br />construction. <br /> <br /> Mert Van Dreser, 40 Castledown Road, believed that residential construction on <br />this site would be a mistake. There are no homes on the west side of Sunol Boulevard <br />from 1-680 to downtown Pleasanton. He felt that was good planning. Housing on the <br />Kaiser site would be surrounded by 1-680 and Sunol Boulevard and industrial buildings. <br />That is not a good environment for children and would present safety problems for the <br />residents and security and liability problems for the corporate operations on the site. lqe <br />urged Council to consider the plan with no homes of any kind. <br /> <br /> Robert Cordtz, 262 West Angela, supported the project. He said thousands of <br />hours and millions of dollars have been spent on the General Plan. Housing was rejected <br />on this site by a vote of 18 to 2. He believed it was inappropriate for the Planning <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 6 03/21/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />