Laserfiche WebLink
Matt Morrison, 5581 Sonoma Drive, indicated that after San Francisco completed <br />the study regarding radionuclides, all the consultants agreed the site is not hazardous for <br />its current use and there were no concerns about contamination on the majority of the <br />property. Future testing would be done for any changed use. He was concemed whether <br />the wording of the PUD would be adequate to require that testing. He stated he had <br />received a call from a staff member from the California Department of Health Services <br />investigative branch which indicated it had received a grant to review contaminated <br />sewage sludge in Livermore and would include the Pleasanton site in that project. He <br />was comfortable that would meet the conditions on the San Francisco PUD and address <br />his concems, so he supported certification of the EIR. He also encouraged citizens to <br />vote yes on Measure I. <br /> <br />There were no other speakers. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Ayala, seconded by Mr. Pico, to adopt Resolution No. <br />00-013, approving the final environmental impact report prepared for the San <br />Francisco Water Department Bernal Property project. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Michelotti, Pico, and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Cotmcilmember Dennis <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6e <br />1999 Growth Manag,ement Reoort and Reouests for Reallocations from Greenbriar <br />Homes {Bridle Creek), Trident Associates {Castlewood Estates). and Black <br />Mountain Development (Carria~,e Gardens). (SR 00:049) <br /> <br />Brian Swift presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver pointed out that when the Council subcommittee met to consider <br />Growth Management, them were no new 1999 requests for allocation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said that was correct. There were three requests for reallocation from <br />1998 to 2000, which would happen automatically under the ordinance if there were major <br />project allocations available in 2000. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked for clarification regarding the draft ordinance amending the <br />Growth Management program. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift explained the only change is to allow the Planning Commission to <br />review the Growth Management Report, which Council had directed staff to process. <br /> <br />Mayor Tarver thought the existing ordinance included a 350 unit per year limit. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 02/15/00 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />