Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Scribner indicated there is no give and take in a survey, or opportunity to debate <br />issues to reach consensus. If Council is going to place a lot of weight on this. she suggested that <br />the next time there is a General Plan Review. that a survey be done and not waste people's time. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis believed the survey will give a different type of information and will not <br />have more weight than other processes. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to approve the agreement for <br />consultant services with Price Research and directing staff to continue to work with them to <br />reduce the fees to $22,476. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Mohr, Pico, Scribner, and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />9. SPECIAL AND INFORMATION REPORTS <br /> <br /> Item 9a <br /> Actions of the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission. (IR 94:58) <br /> <br /> No action was required or taken regarding the Actions report. <br /> <br />10. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br /> <br />Item <br />Circulation Draft TrI-Vallev Transportation Plan/Action Plan. (SR 94:335) <br /> <br />Randall A. Lure presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Ms. Dennis asked if there was a way to increase fees to address future costs. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder agreed there needs to be an escalation clause for fees and a periodic <br />review to be sure the fees are increased in relation to increased costs. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis also believed fees could be reduced if other means are found to collect the <br />ne, cgssary mongy, Shg sugggste. d collecting part of the legs earlier to kggp thg fe~ per unit <br />down. One could accumulate the funds sooner and invest it for when the final transportation <br />improvements are needed. She asked if a financial model had been considered. <br /> <br />10/04/94 <br /> - 15 - <br /> <br /> <br />