My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN092094
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCMIN092094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:30 AM
Creation date
2/1/2000 7:50:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Frank Brandes, 6889 Cone Sonaria, stated traffic signals on Main Street have been <br />debated for years. He greed the signal was proper at this intersection. He felt it was safer and <br />there would be less congestion at certain times of the day. He believed that a flashing red was <br />agreeable at other times of the day, late at night for example. <br /> <br /> Gary Schwaegerle, 189 W. Angela Street, asked for clarification on what triggers the <br />signal to change. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder explained that it was done by loops in the roadway and would be on sixty <br />second cycles, possibly quicker if traffic is light. <br /> <br /> Angelina Summers, 4750 SuRer Gate Avenue, agreed with the staff report and supported <br />the traffic signal. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner related comments from citizens who preferred the stop signs with no <br />flashing traffic signal. She agreed that stop signs affect efficient operation of vehicles, but did <br />not want vehicles to control downtown. The basic idea was to make downtown more pedestrian <br />oriented. She stated them are alternate routes on Peters Avenue and First Street for through <br />traffic. <br /> <br />It was moved by Ms. Scribner, seconded by Mr. Tarver, to leave the stop signs. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis agreed with Mr. Brandes that the signals make sense at certain times of the <br />day. She was concerned about confusion caused to strangers in town who are unfamiliar with <br />the area. She did agree that downtown is for pedestrians and would favor closing Main Street <br />to be a pedestrian mall. However, since it is open as a street, it does not make sense to remove <br />the traffic light. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver believed downtown is unique and people know how to get through a stop <br />sign. He does not want to change it. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr referred to the staff analysis which indicates traffic speed is only affected by <br />one mile an hour, so it makes no difference. Main Street is a major north/south thoroughfare <br />and Council has to deal with traffic. Diverting traffic to Peters is not necessarily the most <br />effective solution. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner asked if the Downtown Association had been noticed on this and Mr. Lure <br />responded he did think so. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner believed comments were needed from the Association and withdrew her <br />motion. She suggested the matter be continued until the next meeting and Council agreed. <br /> <br />09/20/94 <br /> - 13- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.