Laserfiche WebLink
it Was also pointed out that the scho,~l would be ~_-!~:, t%'-:t z"l ~chnol planned <br />in this area, all within a two block radius. Diss=:~,sicr. w{x; held regarding <br />the fact that. this school would be on a dead end st.r~ot n':~d would only have <br />one entrance, which would ar2ong okher traffic iactox-;, czeat a problem in <br />providing ample fire protection. <br /> <br />There being no further protests from the public, it ~xas moved by' Council- <br />man Spiliotopoulos and seconded by Councilman Pears in tii~,t the public hear- <br />ina be closed. , <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Gerton, Pearson, Spi!!otopoulos and Hayor Reid <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Councilman Spiliotopoulos stated that he felt that Pleasanton has a need for <br />this pre-school and Councilman Pearson stated his objections to it. <br /> <br />215. Campbell, in answer to'Councilman Beratlis' c:3egt[on~ stated that this <br />school could cuase as much as two or three times >.=cre traffic on Flagstone <br />Drive and that this street is"a'minor residential street. <br /> <br />After considerable discussion regarding this maht<~n', it was moved by <br />Councilman Beratlis and seconded by Councilman. Patterson that the applicatioB <br />to prezone from the County's Agricultural District to the City of <br />Pleasanton's Public and Institutional ~District, that property cenerally <br />located east of Foothill Road' and' south of Flagstone Drive, said property <br />described as Parcel 69, Block 1049,-Book-941 of Alameda County Assessor's <br />Office and containing approximately 2.07 acres, be denied. <br /> <br />The roll cal~ vote was as fol].ows: <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmen Beratlis, Gerton and Pearson <br />NOES: Councilman Spiliotopoulos and Hayor Reid <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />PLA, TTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION- <br /> <br />There were no matters continued for decision. <br /> <br />SPECIAL REPORTS <br /> <br />There were no special' reports presented at this meeting. <br /> <br />k:'iiPOF. TS OF BOARDS AND CON~IISSIONS <br /> <br />tThf2y'a were no" reports'from-Bop. rds and Commissions. <br /> <br />::',E['ORi'S OF TiiE CITY NANAGER <br /> <br />' ~v :; :::: of Bids: Award 'of ContFjsS,~_~A_~9!~s~_g~j:?f:.._:~:li'___~lmi~roven',an ts on Valley <br /> <br />~'~ E/ .'a~ reviewed the reuort from the Director o~ Public ~7orks dated <br />.'uq~st !7, 1970, which racor"..nw~nded that the ccntr{~.:t be nwarded to the low <br />'!j,'kor who was Watt:is Cens~ruction Ccmpany, irtcerr:l}:rlted, for $62,683.60. <br /> <br /> m,~ .... -~ b~, Councilr::an Get tcu~ anti seconded l~- C<l, ur:<; !.1 y:nn S~} il iotopoulos <br />:: :r;.~ i~esoiution No. 70-185, at'ardi_ng the contra,r:a i:.~ the amount of $62,683.60 <br />~' ' ~ '- ~ ~ ~ Con ~ ,. ~.. construction of <br /> . =,...,... s str:t~c~t <br /> ...... -~ rib C;~ Vii lC:%' <br /> <br /> 2-]_7'-70 <br /> <br /> <br />