CCMIN042472 - Laserfiche WebLink

been a long experience of problems associated witl~ t~is subdivision. The .P~ayor advised the Councilmen that Condition Nc~ 10 was a result of the very fact that the city has a specific problem~ }{e further explained that the applicant proceded without the city's knowledge or concurrance and damaged the water line in this area. He also stated that there has been a series of such problems with the applicant and that his position is that unless the city has some assurance or guarentee that this will not happen again, he will not vote in favor of any further improvements in this property or this subdivision. He further stated that it behooves the City Councilmen to give careful consideration before granting app- roval in this instance~ After furhter discussion regarding this matter and also on the subject of sewer holding tanks being requested for this subdlvision, it was moved by Councilman Pearson and seconded by Mayor Reid that Condition No. 11, exempting lots Nos. 1 and 2 from the adopted Restricted Growth Policy, be denied. After further testimony from the applicant and hi~ assurance that he will conform to all requirements, Mayor Reid called for the vote. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilman Pearson NOES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, ?.~ori and ~layo~: Reid ABSENT: None It was then moved by Councilman Herlihy and seconded by Councilman Kinney that Parcels Nos. 1 and 2, Longview Subdivision, be exempt from the Restricted Growth Policy. Councilman Pearson requested that an amendment be included in the motion requiring the purchasers of the applicant's property to sign a state- ment that he realizes that the sewer ban is in effect, t/~at the time this property could be serviced by the regular sewer system is an unknown enitity, and that he has been given a reasonable estimate of what it is going to cost to pump out the holding tank. Both Councilmen Herlihy and Kinney agreed to the amendment. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori and Mayor Reid NOES: Councilman Pearson ABSENT: None SPECIAL REPORTS ~,%r. Edgar reported that because of the financial and administrative prob- lems of SACEOA, a complete re-vamping, including the selection of a new Executive Director is currently undez~ay. He further reported that a Federal Grant with numerous conditions would most likely be vetoed by the Governor next Thursday. As a recourse, the seven cities in South- ern Alameda County are preparing to appeal the Governor's veto to the Washington D.C. OEO Office. Mr. Edgar stated that each of the cities have developed a position paper on this matter and recommended that the City of Pleasanton do likewise. He outlined the paper which would basically state that 1) the city would work diligentl\/to upgrade SACEOA, 2) the importance of releasing the funds and that they be retain- ed in Southern Alameda County for tile disadvantaged and 3) if the Governors reason for vetoing the grant is because of the disorganization of SACEOA the seven cities will set up and _administer a private non- profit corporation for helping the poor. Councilman Pearson emphasized the need of the funds, ~,,~rhich would amount to $13,000,000 and reviewed some of the problems encountered by SACEOA. 3. 4-24-72