Laserfiche WebLink
The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, and Mayor Reid <br />NOES: Councilman Pearson <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Mayor Reid declared that the public hearing regarding zoning of this property <br />would be continued to the meeting of February 20, 1973. <br /> <br />Application of the City Planning Commission for certain amendments to the Zoning <br />Ordinance to implement the City Council. policy regarding the location of finan- <br />cial institutions within the City <br /> Mayor Reid declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> Mr. Edgar presented the staff report and proposed ordinance regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilman Kinney, and seconded by Councilman Herlihy, that <br />the public hearing be closed. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Pearson, and Mayor Reid <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Councilman Kinney expressed his opposition of this measure, stating it <br />reflects small town politics, and said he intends to vote against it because <br />it was not in the best interests of the City in regard to future industrial <br />growth. <br /> <br /> Councilman Mori stated that in light of previous discussions and decisions <br />regarding financial institutions in the downtown area, to allow banking to go <br />in elsewhere is adulterous of this particular ordinance, therefore, could not <br />support it. <br /> <br /> Councilman Pearson stated he no longer supported this ordinance for the <br />same reason as stated by Councilman Mori. <br /> <br /> Mayor Reid stated that with the reference made to small town politics, he <br />was a little surprised in some respects because the choice very definitely is <br />with the City Council to represent the interests, concerns, and intent of the <br />citizens who took the time to express themselves regarding how they felt this <br />City should develop. Merely stating a General Plan philosophy is not enough, <br />you have to have a legal instrument in which to enforce those policies or philo- <br />sophies. This proposed ordinance states an intention to support a philosophy <br />that we do want to retain a very viable central core in our City. <br /> <br /> Councilman Herlihy stated that it was the intention of the Council to <br />establish for the Planning Commission concrete goals and guidelines for finan- <br />cial institutions. To enhance and support the downtown area, financial in- <br />stitutions should be in the downtown area. Once they are established in the <br />central core, they can branch in regional shopping centers, then in neighbor- <br />hood shopping centers° He further stated it is difficult for new businesses <br />to come into Pleasanton because of our restrictive policy. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilman Herlihy, and seconded by Councilman Kinney, that <br />Ordinance No. 690, allowing financial institutions in outlying areas after they <br />have established a facility in the downtown area or regional shopping center <br />district, be introduced. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, and Mayor Reid <br />NOES: Councilmen Mori and PearsDn <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> 3. 1/29/73 <br /> <br /> <br />