CCMIN101573 - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilman Reid stated his No vote was not against the Swim Club Agreement per se but against the lack of time to review the Agreement, and he expressed his con- cern regarding this kind of Council action without ample opportunity to weigh all the perimeters and considerations involved. Report~ Re: Livemore Airport .EXpansion Mr. Edgar presented the report of the Director of Community Development regard- ing this matter and read Resolution No. 1262, adopted by the Planning Commission on · -- October 10, 1973, advising the City Council of their opposition and concern to any further expansion of the Livermore Airport as it relates to increased air traffic. Councilman Kinney commended the Planning Commission on their research of this matter. After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Kinney, and seconaed by Councilman Herlihy~ to approve the report and resolution of the Planning Commission and authorize City staff to transmit them to the City of Livermore regarding the improvement and expansion of the Livemore Airport, with copies to the appropriate agencies. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Herliby, Kinney, Mori, Reid, and Mayor Pearson ~_~ NOES: None ~-4 ABSENT: None Adqptio~ of Ordinance No..713~ to fezone from the 0 <Office) District to the P.U.D. <Planned Unit Deve. lopment) District that property of Pico Investors, Inc., des- cribed as Book 946, Page 2549, Parcels 1, 2 and 3, said property located south of Palomino Drive between Concord Avenue and Pico Avenuet. cont.ainin8 2.06 acres~ more or less, Pleasanton (This ordinance was introduced last week by. a 3-2 vote) Mr. Edgar stated that Ordinance No. 713, regarding this matter, was introduced last week by a 3-2 vote. He stated there would be two additional public hearings regarding this matter, one before the Planning Commission, and one before the City Council specifying uses. Mr. Scheidig requested that the Council defer action on this ordinance in order to provide him with an opportunity to clarify the additional procedural require- ments of the P.U.D. ordinance and their relationship to the parcel to be resorted. Mr. Jim Jarnagin, 3262 Burgundy Drive, representing Vintage Hills Homeowners Association, stated that most of the concerned residents at the meeting tonight were in opposition to this application. He stated that testimony by individuals would be presented at the next meetingsregarding this matter. After Council discussion, MayOr Pearson declared this item continued to the meeting of November 5, 1973, for further clarification and review. Mayor Pearson recessed the meeting at 8:50 P.M. Mayor Pearson reconvened the meeting at 9:00 P.M. Mr. F. B. Bias, 1050 Concord Street, addressed the Council regarding the Pico P.U.D. and zoning procedures related thereto. SPECIAL REPORTS Review of Resolutions~ Re: ,Acttpn,.P~n Mr. Edgar presented his report regarding this matter, stating there are five resolutions relating to the Action Plan. He explained each resolution and City Council took the following action: Resolution No. 1 - Action Plan for the Future of California Cities It was moved by Councilman Reid, and seconded by Councilman Herlihy, to approve this resolution. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen. Herlihy, Kinney, Mori, Reid, and Mayor Pearson NOES: None ABSENT: None 2. 10/15/73