|
the Alameda C?~,~n~,./pi~-,l.~..~,~g CL~;~mmlsa~3c~ ~s ~z:,~i~eriag chat~ge~ 'in the General Plan
<br /> ~egarding th~ f idg~
<br />
<br /> 1he Cvuuc,~; d~rm~n~d rhe~ should at~dy ~h~ epticn~ and ~nstructed staff to
<br /> p~epate a repz~;:t z?,,.'; ~h~a ma~jLe~ fo~? con~id~':,on at Ehe meeting of October 8. 1973.
<br />
<br /> REPORT~ OF BOARDS
<br /> ~o;r~ of Iraff~c Adv~sor~_~it_ t~Re: R~aneDd~.loB to adop~ Traffic Engineeri~
<br /> Practices Manus ! as E!5?.~?~!ll Consul~anC
<br /> Mr~ Edgar p~eee~red the s~aff repc:~ ~e~ka/~:~c~% ~hia matter~ stating that during
<br /> the ~ourse o~ ~h~ff ~=!;?~.=~.~, 1~ .3t t[].~ ]c~ f~:. :.c ~iT:?/~.~L~eurjsg P~c~ices Manual it has
<br /> been pe~<~d.~c'~-~l./ >~- ~==.~d b~ ~',~ F~' l~'~ A~J ~,-'y (cmmi[tee at various stages, The
<br /> Manual as it ~.~ ~ , ~.. ~? =, ~,h~ ?~:~po~c~.~ ~ ch~ consui~an~s, s~a~f and the
<br /> Comml t~ ee
<br />
<br /> TramPle Ecglnee~i~ [,.~x, ~=~=~ Nanual, as ~blv, i~L~d by [he Traffic Advisory Cosittee.
<br />
<br /> A~ES: Councilme;t~ He~ ~:lhy, Kinney, Mcx'i, ~eLd~ ~t~d Mayor Pearson
<br /> NOES: None
<br /> ABSENT;
<br />
<br /> REPORTS OF 'lhE C i]"~
<br /> .
<br />
<br /> Mr. Edgar presented rb!~= cep~,rn stating thai ~.t; was necessary for the Action
<br /> Comnittee of the g~y ~),r~ aea~.~;.~rces Rec. c~',~e~7 Dem,¢nsrratioa to forrealize itself
<br /> by way of a 3~>~'.~:~: F:;.~,:,:~::. ~.~c~e~aant :n order: [,;:, ,:omplete the charges of Stage I.
<br />
<br /> Conncitar. Re~O ~.a~. ~-~d r?icfe bad been i~ s~.igi~r mod ii'icatlon to the Joint Powers
<br /> Agreement, and t~m~ {:~,::. ~':.i:,c~ City had nosy: yet been determined.
<br />
<br /> it was m~ved ~:.; ~.;;~h ;:.~= k~.'.eid alL,i/5dd,~.;~.i~i~ by C~n~ihhar~ [ierlihy. authorizing
<br />the approO~:iate City ~::5.:<~i,s L3 execute the ,;c.!nt Powers Agreement of the Bay
<br />Del:a Resoucc;es ge~ :;- ~= ~ ?;,~,:<',n~,~;:::~:~n~ gi~,Sng }egai status tc the Action Comittee
<br />in order :;o c~.~topiete ~:'~ :ib.~ge.s o~TM S~age i t~: the P~cject.;
<br /> The ~oI1 call ~ote
<br /> AYES: Ceunc ilmen He~ '~, ~!-:~). Kinney, Mori, Rc id, and Mayor Pearson
<br /> NOES; None
<br /> ABSENT: None
<br />
<br /> ReD~[~ Re: C~r:~ -r~,p..~ =~ ~a~DSmj[E3l ~O ~he S~a~e ~i Califo~nia regarding the
<br />
<br /> Mr E,dga~ c:~'~:~,:n~,d :no .~:a~t report g g this ma~te~. which included a
<br /> ..
<br />~emorandu,~ r :~ :~ ~: ':~ ~::~, ~ t:,': 7.:.:~. 7: f gn g} :~eer ing Set ?L-;es c.~,~ocerning the engineering
<br /> ;i'f~k~,~2,~ ,5 '~::~ i.~g~,:~ 3'.>,',-~i;,~,~e .~nc co,~iUainirlg a ~epor'r~ from Barton-Aschmn
<br />~5a(>'Sl,:iI~'~:. g~'~ ~ ,:~ ~f~'~ .... yO.-iC~.~;'i~ r ro~r~ r-he [~ire~::~ ~:~ Engineering Services con-
<br /> celDinp, the f:f ~2,~,r~] 7 '~r:-~:~.'l~i3~ ,c,,~ St-,~o<~:~ %,:!~e j. 3~nf~rchange and ocher Regional Shop-
<br /> ping Cenre:~ jr~,r~=,~.n~-:~nL-i; :~2d dxc~r~ ol ,~:~ letr2e~ ~'!~n] the City hnager to T~ R.
<br />Lar~'ce~a:. ]7istlzicr ~>~: ~ ~'. ~:.~;7 tn~ D~[;arcmer,/:,l f'kansporta~:ion, outlining a
<br />p~<ypc. sa~ i. 7iy 2~caj ::.~j~-~:i~.~.k.:~t: ~.~! fu~js ~:~wer~ ~be ccnstrucCion of Stoneridge
<br />!nte.~r~.h.~:~:~;{~,:~, 7~:' t',Jg...~: :~';;,~:d i~ was ~l v'~tal importance to get the shopping
<br />,::ec~,~," ,.~ the.: g~.,,,~:~;i ..~c: u~ged ..ipptoval c.;l ~r,e conceptual pact.
<br />
<br />u,~f. ,.,t, }~r~0,)c~,:~-~ i:; ~:.~aia~= Study of the St.>netidge lnterchange~
<br />
<br /> ?e: ~ .lo.e g~:, c i:&~ta~. cepresen~jng Bayshore Pr,~.~ertzes. ~eiterated the position
<br />tz{.k&h by B~,~;h~,4,~e ?YG:}er~:ies earlier. stat:hg that ever since zoning was granted
<br />f:;r rh= regicc,~,~ ~h=,~p?"'ng ,ler~t~rs and we zeaffirmed our position last year. we
<br />have woxked to s~;ive ~he various p~biexns in order to meet our comitment date
<br />for development ir~ i97~;~ ~c c,,rde~ t,~.:~ develop the Center, ~,he initial first phase
<br />will contain oniy [hree d~pi~r:n;,en[ srures due to the grow'oh control restrictions.
<br />The team of Bax ~on--Asctm~a:~ has done w~rk t'or Bayshore and the City regarding this
<br />project~ Expenses have beer; carried by the developer in connection with traffic.
<br />iL would u.~w ~e,~tl] Lha~ the plan meets width the apprc-~ai of all parties concerned
<br />and is ~e~ady l"~x ~e,:,, ,~n.~c~d~i;~n t.:; the Sra~e,. Bayshore Properties feel that the
<br />method of financing prc,,pcseo, by ~oFmacion of assessment districts. is feasible.
<br />Except for a small pox c~lon ~.:. ~y~:rk ~h~, relates to extension of Stoneridge Drive
<br />no outside property ~wnex, ~ce ~uwD~,'~ed~, The City would not be expected to make
<br /> 5 ,; 10/1/73
<br />
<br />
<br />
|