Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by CouncilnAn Herlihy, and seconded by Councilman Kinney, that <br />staff be authorized to prepare application to Local Agency Formation Commission <br />on Annexation No. 69, 3.06 acres East of Stanley Boulevard° <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Herlihy, Kinney, Councilwoman LeClaire, Councilman Philcox, <br /> and Mayor Mori <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Amendment to Fees and Char~es Resolution~ Re:.Sewer Connection Fees <br /> Mr. Edgar explained the reasons for requesting the sewer connection fee in- <br />crease and the need to retain and protect the financial viability of the sewer <br />phase out fund as well as a reserve for repairs to the Sunol Plant. <br /> <br /> Mr. Walker presented the staff report, dated September 1!, 1974, regarding <br />this matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Scheidig emphasized that the Council should be cognizant of the intangibles <br />costwise related to this matter. He emphasized that in addition to the staff re- <br />port Council must be aware that the actual cost for the interceptor sewer line, <br />the actual amount which the City will have to pay V.C.S.D. for buying into their <br />Plant, and the cost of additional repairs to the Sunol Plant are unknown at this <br />time. Thus, while the staff has come up with cost estimates, these figures may <br />not be the final cost to the City and there is a need to insure a proper reserve <br />for these costs. In addition, the phase out of the Sunol Plant is the condition <br />precedent for expansion of the V.C.S.D~ Plant - the entire sewage disposal situa- <br />tion in the City must be viewed as a single problem - as if the City had two <br />Plants. The sewer connection fee will apply throughout the City and it is for <br />the Council to determine what a reasonable sum is for such connection. It was <br />the City Attorney's opinion that the cost to the City for the Morrison Suit was <br />not a proper charge for inclusion in the sewer connection fee. <br /> <br /> The following persons expressed concern regarding the sewer connection fee <br />increase and requested further study of the matter: <br /> <br /> Dick Braden, MacKay and Somps <br /> Bud Lake, representing Associated Building Industry <br /> Bill Leonard, Executive Director, Associated Building Industry <br /> Harry Elliott, Jr., Developer, 47 Quail Court, Walnut Creek <br /> <br /> Mayor Mori declared this item continued to Thursday, September 19, 1974, <br />4:00 P.M., Pleasanton Justice Court, 30 West Angela Street. <br /> <br />Matters for the Information of the Council <br /> Mr. Edgar presented draft of Air Quality Section of Environmental impact <br />Report portion of Project Report, and stated other reports would be available <br />soon. <br /> <br /> Mr. Edgar presented his report and that of the Police Department regarding <br />602L Penal Code in the area of the Amador High School. <br /> <br /> Mr. Edgar presented a letter from Tele-Vue Systems, Inc., regarding their <br />policy on customer service calls. <br /> <br /> Mro Edgar presented a memorandum from the Director of Planning regarding <br />Livermore Airport Master Plan Public Hearing. <br /> <br /> Mro Edgar presented a League of California Cities bulletin related to <br />EoP~A. Parking Facility Kegulations beginning january 1, 1975, <br /> <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY <br />~eR~r~, Re: Holdin~ Tanks for iacono-Drews Property <br /> Mr. Scheidig presented his report, dated September 11, 1974, regarding this <br />matter, stating that it is necessary for the City Council to allow a blanket <br />authorization £or holding tanks on the property owned by Oacono and Drews in <br />order to allow for the coherent development of the Iacono and Drews property. <br /> <br /> 6. 9/16/74 <br /> <br /> <br />