Laserfiche WebLink
<br />445 <br /> <br />The roll <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />call vote was as follows: <br />Councilmembers Herlihy, LeClaire, <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />McLain, Philcox, and Mayor Kinney <br /> <br />Hopyard Road Line - Status of Repairs <br />Mr. Campbell presented background report and problems related to the Hopyard <br />Road line, and corrective measures taken regarding this matter. He indicated that <br />the infiltration has been rectified to the satisfaction of Valley Community Ser- <br />vices District since they are now advertising for additional sewer connections. <br /> <br />Long Term Solutions <br />Status of Project <br />Mr. Campbell presented status of project stating that nothing has changed <br />regarding this matter. <br /> <br />Review of Alternative Courses of Action, Probable Schedules, and Points of Decision <br />Mr. Ted Erler, Kennedy Engineers, presented courses of action leading to a <br />single solution to be selected from four present alternatives which are being in- <br />vestigated. The alternatives are all modified versions of the two "best apparent" <br />projects presented in the Project Report and are briefly described as follows: <br /> <br />1. Project 2-b-l, Interceptor sewer to V.C.S.D. V.C.S.D. Plant to be enlarged <br />to 8.0 mgd. Partial grant funding. <br /> <br />2. Project 2-b-2, Interceptor sewer to V.C.S.D. V.C.S.D. Plant to be enlarged <br />to 7.3 mgd, of which 6.5 mgd for wastewater and 0.8 mgd is infiltration <br />allowance. Maximum grant funding. (Designated Clean Water Project No. <br />75C-l082). <br /> <br />3. Project 5-b-l, New City 2.5 mgd Plant and interim continued use of spray <br />fields. Possible future effluent tie to LAVWMK. With grant funding. <br /> <br />4. Project 5-b-2, New City 2.5 mgd Plant similar to Project 5-b-l. No grant <br />funding. <br /> <br />Mr. Erler presented materials that had been prepared by City staff and con- <br />sultants to aid in selecting a course of action. He also presented advantages and <br />disadvantages for each alternative project. He further presented Action Diagrams <br />for each alternative project. <br /> <br />After discussion, Council instructed staff to prepare a report regarding pos- <br />sible ballot measures regarding sewer and parks for the March 1976 Election, for <br />review in August. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br />Set Public Hearing on Redevelopment Plan <br />Mr. Bowling presented the report regarding this matter. <br /> <br />It was moved by Councilmember McLain, and seconded by Counci1member <br />that the Public Hearing on the Pleasanton Redevelopment Plan be set for <br />1975. <br />The roll <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Philcox, <br />August 11, <br /> <br />call vote was as follows: <br />Councilmembers Herlihy, LeClaire, <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />McLain, Phil cox , and Mayor Kinney <br /> <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY <br />Retroactive Compensation for City Manager, City Attorney, Top Management, Middle <br />Mana~ement and Confidential Employees <br />Mr. Scheidig presented his report regarding this matter. <br /> <br />It was moved by Councilmember LeClaire, and seconded by Councilmember McLain, <br />that Resolution No. 75-142, indicating the City Council's intention to grant to <br />City Manager, City Attorney, Top Management, Middle Management and Confidential <br />employees compensation for Fiscal Year 1975-76 retroactive to July 1, 1975, be <br />adopted. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />6/30/75 <br />