Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, By letter of April 9, 1975, from Mr. Bill B. Dendy to Mr. Paul DeFalco the <br /> State has preliminarily indicated that the total grant fundable capacity <br /> for the expanded V.C.S~D. plant has been determined to be 6~516 MGD; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The proposed total combined capacity of 6.516 MGD is less than the sum of <br /> the existing separate capacities of 6.7 MGD, is less than the projected <br /> flows at the time of completion of the proposed expansion, is less than <br /> necessary to provide for fulfilling existing legal and moral obligations <br /> of the City and V.CoS~D., is less than necessary to provide for the <br /> planned, orderly and reasonable growth of the City, and would be detri- <br /> mental to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Said preliminary determination is in direct conflict with the conditions <br /> set forth in the above mentioned Resolution Noo 74-212, and therefore <br /> unacceptable to the City of Pleasanton; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, By previously referred to letter State has indicated its intention to <br /> include a grant condition relating to air quality restricting connections <br /> to the sewer system until various standards are met and until approved by <br /> the State; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City finds said proposed condition to be of dubious legality, imprac- <br /> tical to implement, inappropriate with respect to the control of water <br /> pollution, a flagrant usurpation of local authority, counterproductive in <br /> that it will prolong water pollution control problems that the grant pro- <br /> gram is intended to solve, and generally unacceptable in that it would <br /> effectively prevent the City from fulfilling its obligations. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. The proposed grant fundable capacity of 6.516 MGD is hereby found to be <br /> unacceptable to the City. <br /> <br />Section 2. The proposed condition relating to air quality and restricting connections <br /> is hereby found to be unacceptable to the City. <br /> <br />Section 3. The City of Pleasanton hereby notifies the State of its intention to re- <br /> fuse any grant offer made in the proposed amount and with said proposed <br /> condition. <br /> <br />Section 4. The City Council hereby directs the City staff to apply to the Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board for discharge requirements for a new sewage <br /> treatment plant to be constructed by the City, as provided under Section <br /> 2 of the previously adopted Resolution No. 74-212. <br /> <br />Section 5. The City Council hereby directs the Mayor of the City to prepare and <br /> present a statement in opposition to the newly proposed grant condition <br /> limiting sewer connections in air impact areas at the State Board meet- <br /> ing on May 12, 1975. <br /> <br />Section 6. The City Council hereby directs the staff to write a letter to the <br /> Chairman of the Environmental Pollution Sub-Committee of the Senate <br /> Public Works Committee which is now holding oversite hearings on the <br /> Clean Air Act and indicate the problems which have been experienced by <br /> the City in attempting to correct water pollution problems. <br /> <br />Section 7o The City Clerk shall transmit a copy of this Resolution to the State <br /> Water Resources Control Board, the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board, the Valley Community Services District, and all <br /> other concerned or interested Local, Regional, State, and Federal <br /> agencies and individuals° <br /> <br />Section 8. This Resolution shall become effective immediately on its passage and <br /> adoption. <br /> <br />be adopted~ <br /> <br /> 4. 4/28/75 <br /> <br /> <br />