CCMIN111075 - Laserfiche WebLink

229' Mayor Kinney emphasized the need to abide by the campaign disclosure regulations of Proposition 9 and the Election Law for proponents and opponents of Ballot Measures. It was moved by Councilmember Philcox, and seconded by Councilmember McLain, that Resolution No. 75-240, a Resolution of Intention to place on March, 1976, Ballot a measure relating to Redevelopment, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Herlihy, LeClaire, McLain, Philcox, and Mayor Kinney NOES: None ABSENT: None PUBLIC HEARINGS Joint Public Hearin~ of Pleasanton Redevelopment A~enc~ and City Council on Redevelop- merit Plan and Environmental Impact Report for Pleasanton Redevelopment Project (Continued Open from August 11~ 1975) Mayor Kinney stated this is the time for the continuation of the Joint Public Hearing by the Pleasanton City Council and the Pleasanton Redevelopment Agency to consider the proposed revised Redevelopment Plan for the Pleasanton Redevelopment Project, and the final Environmental Impact Report for the Project. Mayor Kinney declared the continued hearing open. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL Councilmembers Herlihy, LeClaire, McLain, Philcox, and Mayor Kinney were present. ROLL CALL OF AGENCY Members Herlihy, LeClaire, McLain, Philcox, and Chairman Kinney were present. Mayor Kinney stated that on August 11, 1975, a joint public hearing was held by the City Council and Agency on the proposed Redevelopmerit Plan and the final Environ- mental Impact Report on the Plan. At the time, and with prior public notice, evidence and testimony was received and the public hearing was continued to this date for the purpose of conducting meetings with Project Area residents and businesses and develop- ing revisions in the boundaries as well as contents and scope of the Plan. Mayor Kinney added that no decision on the Redevelopment Plan will be made this evening since this matter will be on the Ballot ohMarch 2, 1976, as requested by the Pleasanton Redevelopment Agency at their meeting of November 3, 1975, and the City Council in earlier session this evening. Mayor Kinney stated these are formal proceedings on which a record is based, so the public testimony should be factual, truthful and pertinent to the Redevelopment Plan or the Environmental Impact Report. The full record of the August 11, 1975, hearing is a part of this record and has been reviewed by Members of the Council and the Agency, so it is not necessary to repeat testimony already given. The purpose of this continued hearing is to receive evidence and testimony on the Redevelopment Plan as currently proposed° Mr. Edgar placed into the record the following documents: EXHIBIT 17 - Notice of Special Meeting of the Agency. (This is a regular meeting of the City Council). In addition, all Project property owners and taxing agencies were reminded by letter of the con- tinuation of this Public Hearing and provided a summary of the basic revisions to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. EXHIBIT 18 - Letter sent to all project property owners and taxing agencies. Mr. Edgar introduced into evidence and also placed into the record the follow- ing documents: EXHIBIT 19 - The revised Redevelopment Plan. 2. 11/10/75