CCMIN111075 - Laserfiche WebLink

231; EXHIBIT 20 - A document entitled Supplemental Accompanying Report to the City Council, which summarizes the changes in boundaries and in the content and scope of the Redevelopment Plan, the reasons for the changes, the effects of the changes on the Project Area and its residents and property owners, the revised financing projections for the Project, and other pertinent information, and also con- rains an addendum, Volume III, to the final Environmental Impact ..... Report, regarding the changes. Mr. Edgar reviewed meetings with project area residents, property owners, and businesses, and reviewed basic revisions to the Redevelopment Plan with regard to reduced boundaries, specified projects, limitations on Agency acquisition of pro- perty, and projected five-year time span of project activities. Mr. Edgar reviewed the new project area boundaries, and the reasons for this selection, stressing deficiencies and how the specified Redevelopment activities will correct these deficiencies to upgrade the Project Area. Mr. Edgar reviewed the impact of revisions on relocation requirements, number of persons affected, requirement that relocation housing be available, and summary of financial relocation assistance. Mr. Walker reviewed the effect of revisions on costs, financing, impacts on other taxing agencies and rev£~wed PRA Resolution No. 75-7, regarding financial assistance to school districts. Mr. Edgar reviewed the inclusion in the Supplemental Report of a report and recommendation of the Planning Commission approving boundary changes, finding revised Redevelopment Plan conforms to General Plan of the City, and recommending adoption. Mr. Edgar presented the Supplemental Accompanying Report which contains an addendum Volume III to the final Environmental Impact Report which, briefly summarized, concludes that the revisions of the Project Area boundaries and scope of the Plan will reduce any adverse impacts on residents and property owners and enhance the achievement of the environmental objectives of the Plan and the mea- sures necessary to mitigate serious impacts on the City of the new Shopping Center development when it takes place. Mr. Edgar ,entered into the record the following documents: EXHIBIT 21 - A summary of meetings with Project Area residents and businesses. EXHIBIT 22 - Summary of communications and responses. Mayor Kinney stated that now is the time to hear any evidence or testimony from those present desiring to speak, keeping in mind that this matter has been placed on the March 2, 1976, Ballot and that no decision will be made on the Plan tonight. PUBLIC TESTIMONY The following persons spoke in favor of the revised proposed Redevelopment Plan: Ben Fernandez, President of Chamber of Commerce, on behalf of the Special Subcommittee of the Chamber of Commerce on .... Redevelopment Warren Harding, 540 E. Angela Street Yvan Albert, 7926 Hillsboro Court Jim Drush, 4255 Churchill Court The following persons spoke in opposition to the revised proposed Redevelopment Plan and the Pleasanton Redevelopment Agency: Jim Jordan, 7218 Stonedale'Drive, who presented a written report from CARD for the record. Don Savery, 6738 Rancho Court 3. 11/10/75