My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN111576
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
CCMIN111576
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:48:08 AM
Creation date
11/16/1999 12:04:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finally, the Council indicated that they wished to proceed with other <br />items related to the resolution of the sewage treatment problem at this time <br />8o that if the Project is approved in March construction could begin soon <br />thereafter. These items related to the negotiations with VCSD, the design <br />of the ID. terceptor Sewer Lima~ ameDdment to the Joint Powers Agreement, etc. <br /> <br />GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM <br /> Councilmember Herlihy raised the question of responing to the reclamation <br />policy and guidelines proposed by the State Mining and Geology Board. He read <br />a letter dated November 15, 1976, setting forth a proposed response. After <br />some discussion the Council approved said letter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Edgar then made some introductory comments regarding the information <br />that had been distributed to the City Council and the fact that the staff <br />wanted to discuss the County Proposed Amendment to the County General Plan <br />as well as Pleasantonts Growth Management Program with the Council. <br /> <br /> Mr. Harris reviewed the document entitled "LivermoreAmador Valley Planning <br />Unit Plan Amendment Consideration and EIR" dated November 9, 1976 After some <br />discussion of the alternatives contained in the report the City Council auth- <br />orized the Mayor to address a letter to the County Planning Commission indicating <br />that of the alternatives presented in the report Alternative 2C is the only one <br />acceptable to the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> At this point Mr. Harris reviewed his memorandum dated November 12, 1976, <br />related to policy decisions concerning the Growth Management Program. After <br />considerable discussion relating to growth projections, environmental issues, <br />and housing, the City Council gave direction to the staff to proceed with the <br />draft of the Growth Management Program as based upon direction given to the <br />staff by the City Council and Planning Commission. <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SESSION <br /> After some discussion, the City Council adjourned to an Executive Session <br />at 12:00 P.M., to discuss potential litigation with H. C. Elliott, Inc. <br /> <br /> Mayor Philcox reconvened the meeting at 12:10 A.M. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> Mayor Philcox adjourned the meeting at 12:15 A.M., to meet again in Regular <br />Session at 8:00 P.M., on November 22, 1976. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br /> <br /> 2. 11/15/76 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.