CCMIN101177 - Laserfiche WebLink

1313 Mr. Datwyler asked that if his project was delayed, could he obtain a time extention on his sewer permits. Council agreed to a time extension in the event Mr. Datwylerts development was unavoidably delayed as a result of the Pleasanton Safe Street Association Suit against Morrison Homes and the City. The time extension would be equiva- lent to the actual delay experienced by Mr. Datwyler. Mrs. Olga Morrow, 4593 Del Valle Parkway, spoke in opposition to the Negative Declaration as it relates to traffic. There being no further public testimony, Mayor Philcox declared the public hearing closed on the Negative Declaration and application of Darwin. Datwyler. Mr. Scheidig reviewed the City's guidelines for determining whether to re- quire an Environmental Impact Report or a Negative Declaration He noted that the City Council had its environmental guidelines before them, and Mr. Harris reviewed what mitigation measures would obviate or minimize any potential adverse effects of the project. Mayor Philcox noted in discussing the Negative Declaration for the project that Conditions 1-3, 6-9, 13-23, 25 and 27 attached to the proposed rezoning would mitigate problems relating to the following aspects of the project: light glare, air quality, traffic, energy consumption, water consumption, aesthetics, reduction in vegetation, dust generation, congestion of vehicles in the area, and recreation. It was moved by Mayor Philcox, and seconded by Councilmember LeClaire, that Resolution No. 77-269, determining, on the basis of a review of initial environ- mental study done for this project, that no significant adverse environmental Cit ' impact would occur as outlined in the y s guidelines, due to the inclusion of mitigation measures to off-set any adverse environmental effects, that a Negative Declaration is appropriate for a project to fezone a 2.56 acre parcel of land located between the Arroyo del Valle and the future Del Valle Parkway roughly 1,600 feet east of Hopyard Road from the RM-2000 (Multiple Family Resi- dential) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) District and to approve a development plan proposing the construction of a 22 unit, two-story townhouse development immediately westerly of the existing single family residence on the lot, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Herlihy, LeClaire, and Mayor Philcox NOES: Councilmember Mercer ABSENT: None Council discussion then ensued regarding the proposed rezoning and development plan. The Council reviewed the conditions of approval and requested the City Attorney to devise language regarding the Pleasanton Safe Streets Association Suit and extension of time for sewer permits. Mr. Scheidig advised Council of amendments to Condition No. 17, and recom- mended language for Conditions 28 and 29 regarding~ respectively, the Pleasanton Safe Streets Association litigation and extension of time for sewer permits. 10/11/77