CCMIN060578 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Swift responded that staff looked at the existence and completeness of the planned routes residents would be using in allocating points for Traffic Circulation, and noted that the time a driver took to reach the Central Busi- ness District or the freeway was irrelevant to the Residental Allocation Pro- gram. He reiterated that the staff felt residents would choose to use W. Las Positas Blvd., if the interchange/overcrossing were completed. Council deferred taking action on this question until after closing the public hearing, when all "discretionary" items would be decided. 78-5 - Casa de Califia John Caroline, 608 Main Street, stated he agreed with staff's ranking of projects. He added this development was already under construction and he felt it should Be completed in order to finalize the project. 78-6 - P & M Development-Sonoma Drive and Junipero Ted Myers, 1811 Santa Rita Road, concurred with the staff report. He also asked why some projects with garages received a point in the bicycle utiliza- tion section while others did not. Mr. Swift responded that projects classified as '~ultiple" in the Residen- tial Allocation Program received a point for garages while "single-family" projects did not. 78-7 - P & ~ Development-Mission Drive apd Dolores Ted Myers, 1811 Santa Rita Road, stated he had no reservations regarding ranking of this project. 78-8 - ~brrison Homes-Tract 3344 Bob Miller, representing Morrison Homes, stated he had no questions regard- ing ranking of this project. F~-9 - MorriSpn H.o~e~Ngrthwa7 Downs Bob Miller stated there were no questions on the ranking of this project. 78-10 ~ H. C. Elliott-Vintage Hills Harry Ellfort, Jr., stated he had no objections to staff's report. Councilmember Brandes queried staff over whether the water line "link" completed a loop. Mr. Swift explained the rationale for water lines as being major lines completing links and stated he was unsure whether this link com- pleted a loop per se or was an intertie. 78-11 - SAVCO No one spoke on this project. 78-12 - FMP Townhouses Merton Murray, 470 Mavis Drive, requested an explanation of the difference Between infilling and missing links, and stated he felt that Contribution to the Capital Improvement Fund did not make one project better than another and that he was opposed to this type of element in the Residential Allocation Program. Mr. Swift explained the Missing Links and In-filling elements. 2. 6/5/78