My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN121179
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
CCMIN121179
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:48:38 AM
Creation date
11/11/1999 12:42:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
read the Zoning Code relative to recreational vehicles on private property. Coun- <br />cilmember Wood stated he did not feel another ordinance was necessary to control <br />the parking of recreational vehicles. After discussion, it was moved by Council- <br />member Kephart, and seconded by Mayor Brandes, that the City Manager and City Attor- <br />ney be directed to prepare a draft ballot measure for the April municipal election <br />which would place limits and restrictions on the parking and storage of recreational <br />vehicles and similar vehicles in Pleasanton and that the draft ballot measure should <br />be returned for review by the Council at the January 8, 1980, meeting at which time <br />the City Council can vote to place this matter on the ballot. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kephart stated he had been informed that the Federal Correctional <br />Facility at Santa Rtta would soon be housing male inmates. Councilmember Kephart <br />reviewed the change in type of prisoner inmates at the prison and expressed great <br />concern regarding this matter. He requested the City Attorney to determine if the <br />Environmental Impact Report that was prepared.for the Facility is consistent with <br />Federal guidelines and is a legal document. The City Attorney advised there had <br />been questions raised regarding the brevity of the document. Mr. Levine stated he <br />was not in a position to advise on this matter and recommended that the City staff <br />be authorized to hire an attorney experienced in Federal litigation to investigate <br />the legality of the Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the Federal Cor- <br />rectional Facility. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and <br />seconded by Mayor Brandes, directing the City Attorney to explore the possibility <br />of hiring a consultant to determine if there is cause for action relative to the <br />Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the Federal Correctional Facility at <br />Santa Rita. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> Councilmembers presented various Committee Reports for the information of the <br />Council. <br /> <br />MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br /> Mr. John Innes, 1586 Foothill Road, representing the Coalition for Responsible <br />Government, a group of Pleasanton and area residents formed over the last month as <br />a means to address the Council with concerns that they feel in large part have gone <br />unheard. At present, membership in this coalition is made up of individuals and <br />homeo~ers organizations from the areas of Pleasanton Meadows, Stoneridge, Longview, <br />Heritage Valley, Pleasanton Valley, Laguna Vista, Foothill Road, Amador Estates, <br />Stoneridge Condo's, Happy Valley, Old Town-Downtown, and Las Positos Condo's. Mr. <br />Innis stated their concerns were as follows: (1) that the character and quality of <br />recent developments and development proposals in Pleasanton are not representative <br />of the interests of the residents of Pleasanton, nor a consensus of their views; <br />(2) that the General Plan is being abused and rendered meaningless by the inordi- <br />nate number of development-by-development General Plan amendments, that the type <br />and character of developments to be placed in the open areas surrounding our neigh- <br />borhoods is totally unpredictable because of these proposal-by-proposal changes. <br />That local homeowners who have expected one type of land use are forced to accept <br /> <br /> 4. 12/11/79 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.