CCMIN111379 - Laserfiche WebLink

It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, .... that Ordinance No. 918 be read by title only and waive further reading thereof. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that Ordinance No. 918, approving the application of Flying "J", Inc., for Planned Unit Development (Industrial and Commercial) zoning for a 60 acre site located immediately south of Johnson Drive and about 700 feet west of Hopyard Road and for the specific approval for a 62,000 sq. ft. motel to be located on the northwesterly 8.1 acres of the site, the property is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development-Industrial) District, subject to conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 1811 with Condition No. 39 modified to read as follows: "That the developer dedicate to the City for street right-of-way purposes the amount of land necessary for a 44 ft.wide street along the Johnson Drive frontage of the property", and amending the Zoning Map of the City of Pleasanton accordingly, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: Councilman Kephart ABSENT: None Mayor Brandes recessed the meeting at 9:15 P.M. Mayor Brandes reconvened the meeting at 9:25 P.M. Application of Messrs. Boatright and Goodrich for development plan approval fo!r a 28-unit residential development on a 74.5 acre site located west of Foothill Road and north of Lon~view Drive. The site is zoned }~D (Hillside Planned Development) District On the basis of an Initia~ ~tud~ of the potential enviro.nmeptal impacts of the pro- ~ect, .the Director of Plannin~ and CommUnity Deve.lopment has determined that the proposed project would not have any..potential significant adverse effects on the . This envirop~ent and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared.., Initial Study is available for review at the Planning D~v..i.sion}, 200 Bernal Avenue,~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Planning staff prior to the above meeting ~ate~ or di~ectl.y. to the City Council at the above noticed meetin~ Mr. Harris presented his report dated November 6, 1979, regarding this matter. Mayor Brandes declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. Mr. William Hirst, 147 Bernal Avenue, Attorney representing the applicant, re- viewed=the history of the property and the proposed low density development. He stated this parcel had participated in three assessment district. Mr. Hirst stated this property had been placed in the HPD District several months ago; that the upper 55 acre portion of the parcel is allowing 1 dwelling unit for every 5 acres and that the proposal being considered tonight is for 28 lots, 11 of which are re- flected in the 19 acre strip fronting on Foothill Road. Mr. Hirst reviewed the comprehensive soils report, traffic report and seismic report. He stated he felt the plan was well within the HPD ordinance requirements and that he concurred with the 52 conditions as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 1808 as well as the 3 additional conditions recommended by staff. 7. 11/13/79