CCMIN102379 - Laserfiche WebLink

The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, and Mercer NOES: Councilman Wood and Mayor Brandes ABSENT: None The following conditions listed above were modified by the City Council: Conditions Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 16, 22, and 26. Conditions No. 27 through 31 are new conditions. Mayor Brandes thanked the developer and Pleasanton Heights homeowners for their cooperation on this proposed development. Mayor Brandes recessed the meeting at 10:45 P.M. Mayor Brandes reconvened the meeting at 10:55 P.M. Mr. Oakes requested that items 8b, 8c, and 8d on the agenda be considered simultan- eously. Council concurred. Ap. plica.tign of the Planning Commission to fezone a roughly 95 acre area located east of the developed_~ortion of the Fairlands area (bounded generally.by 1-580 on the ~ort.h~ the Cit~ Limits on the east~ the Arroyo Mocho on the south~ ~nd existing development on the west) from the R-1-6500 (Single-Family Residential-6,500.s~. ft. minimum lot size) District to the R-i-IO~000 (Sin~l~Family Residential-10~000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) District 0r any other zoning district consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the p~o- .~ect,. ~he.-Director of Plannin~ and Co,mm.~.ity Development has determined that the propoSed.project would n~t have any...potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be Rrepared. This Initial Study is available for review at the Planning Division~ 200 Bernal Avenues.. Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Plannin~ staff.. prior to the above meetin~..date~ or dir~ctlX to theCity Council at the abo~e noticed meetin~ Appeal of denial of ~pplication of George Qakes. Amador Valle7 Investors~ to fezone an 8.8 acre site located east of the existin~ development on Churchill Drive and south of the extension of Fairlands Drive from the R-1-6500 (Single-Family Residen- tial) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development.) District and for development p~an approval for a 41 lot sin~.le-family detached residential subdivision. The ~ouncil may recommend approval of the proposed chan~e or may recommend rezoning the property to any other zoning district consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Stud~ of the potential environmental impacts of the p.r9- J.ect, ~e D.ire~tor of Plannin~ and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial Stud~ is available for review at the Plannin~ Divis, ion~ 200 Bernal Avenue~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Planning. staff prior to the above meeting date~. or d~rectly to the City Council at the above noticed meetin~ Appeal of denial of application of Amador Valley Investors for rezoning of an appro- ~imatel7 27.20~ acre parcel located just east of the existing terminus of West Las Positas Boulevard described as Assessor's Parcel No. 99B-3961-27-2 from "A"~(Agri- cultural) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Deveiopm~nt) District. The City Co~ncfl 11. 10/23/79