Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Kephart inquired as to the number of hours per day of operation. <br />Mr. Connolly advised that the hours of operation per day depend on the work load <br />which he did not see ever running 24 hours a day, and rarely from 6:00 a.m. to <br />10:00 p.m. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kephart asked if it is standard practice for the safety officer <br />and the consultant to be one and the same in the operation. Mr. Connolly advised <br />that Mr. Frank Bolde is this firm's consultant and that he works for several com- <br />panies. Mr. Connolly added that it is a State requirement that Interstate Laundry <br />be inspected by a private consultant. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kephart asked if there were other operations similar to Interstate <br /> in the State. Mr. Connolly advised there were similar nuclear laundries in the <br /> State. <br /> <br /> Mr. George Bakovitch, Interstate Uniform Services Corporation Health and Safety <br />Director, stated that for radiation protection, the agency is required to have a <br />radiation safety officer and the plant manager is the assistant. Mr. Bakovitch <br />advised that his purpose is to come unannounced at any time he pleases to see that <br />all regulations are being enforced. He added that the State also conducts inspec- <br />tions. He stated that the State can discuss any safety problems if the Council <br />desires to review this issue, however, the only request of Interstate is for a <br />building expansion to store clean clothing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Earl White, Environmental Consultant, stated this facility is no hazard to <br />people living around it or persons working in the laundry. He also advised there <br />is not enough radio-activity to cause any harm even in case of disaster. <br /> <br /> The following persons spoke in opposition to any expansion of the nuclear laundry: <br /> <br /> Ms. Marcia Taylor, 125 Ray Street, stated she strongly opposed any expansion of <br />the facility. She advised she had been gathering information against the laundry <br />for the last six months. She presented a map of the area showing the proximity of <br />residences to the laundry. Ms. Taylor expressed great concern regarding the health, <br />safety, and welfare of residents in the immediate area and also the possible unknown <br />effects on unborn babies. Ms. Taylor presented pictures of the laundry area, em- <br />phasizing its unsightliness. She also presented a petition signed by 274 residents <br />which read as follows: <br /> <br /> "We the people of Pleasanton believe that the Interstate Uniform Services <br /> Corp should not be allowed to expand and that all lawful means be used <br /> to remove them from the City of Pleasanton. We believe that the trans- <br /> portation of and presence of radioactivily contaminated clothing in <br /> Pleasanton poses an inherent danger to our community regardless of the <br /> safety precautions taken". <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor reiterated her position in opposition to any expansion of the Inter- <br />state Laundry, and urged Council to deny the application. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kephart asked Ms. Taylor if she had considered moving so she would <br />not be living near the laundry. Ms. Taylor stated she could not move because of <br />financial reasons. <br /> <br /> Mr. Leonard Post, Attorney, talked in general about radiation and its effects. <br />He stated the laundry had been cited in the past for various violations. He pointed <br />out the staff report stated it cannot deal with the issue of radiation dangers. Mr. <br />Post stated that no soils study had been done at the plant in five years and that a <br /> <br /> 4. 12/9/80 <br /> <br /> <br />