My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN102880
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
CCMIN102880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:51:52 AM
Creation date
11/11/1999 12:18:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Mercer stated he felt that special events signs should be exempted from <br />the ordinance; that it should regulate political signs only. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated he favored the existing prohibition of signs and <br />the time limits established but opposed the remaining proposed regulations. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr expressed concern about signs in public right-of-ways, and <br />the lack of enforcement. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, to <br />initiate a political and certain temporary signs ordinance as proposed by the City <br />Attorney; to be referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation <br />then final consideration by Council. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Butler <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Kephart <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated he felt this ordinance is another example of over- <br />regulation by government. <br />Further' Report on Low Cost Housing Ex.emptions from RAP and Density Bonus LeSislation <br />(Contd. from 10-14-80)' <br /> Mr. Levine presented his report (SR 80:297) dated October 9, 1980, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> ~Ir. FaUl Baldchi, after some questions, stated he favored 25-30% low income units <br />and that a project with this percentage should be totally exempt from the Residential <br />Allocation Program. - <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Council' <br />member Butler, that Resolution No. 80-279, establishing a policy that projects <br />utilizing the Residential Allocation Program exemption have at least 50% low in- <br />come housing units unless the project sponsor can show that the available subsidies <br />are only available for low income projects having a lower percentage of low income <br />units and that the proposed project contain the highest proportion of low income <br />units attainable, and in no case should the exemption be granted to any project with <br />less than 20% lower income units; and that Council policy should be the same for <br />non-subsidized projects except that to reduce a project to below 50% lower income <br />units the project sponsor must show that the project as a whole is economically <br />unviable with 50% of its units available to lower income households and that the <br />lower percentage (but still above the 20% floor) is the maximum proportion of low <br />income units economically attainable, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Kephart <br /> <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br /> There were no Communications presented at this meeting. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR <br /> Mr. Walker presented the Calendar for the information of the Council. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer advised there would be a LAFCO meeting no November 6, 1980, 3:00 <br />P.M., in Hayward. <br /> <br /> ll. 10/28/80 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.