CCMIN091680 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer, stated he felt staff prepared a good report. He reiterated his feeling that the Residential Allocation Program should be abolished. He stated he felt RAP all along should have recognized those improvements which have been completed in the past as well as those to be done in the future. He stated if Council now gives points for past improvements of projects which have received phased approval, it would be an injustice to those projects which were denied such points in the past. Mr. Fairfield stated that point allocation for past improvements should be consistent and that no points should be given unless there is a change in the ordi- nance for past credits. He agreed the Residential Allocation Program need to be clarified as to when a three year phased project can apply for additional phases to that project. Mr. Harry Regan, 800Main Street, stated he had seven lots that had previously been subdivided therefore he was not eligible for exemption from RAP in the four-lot or less category and had to compete with the large developer, which he did not feel was equitable. Mayor Mercer said it was the intent of his motion that any develop- ment of four or less lots per year should be exempt from the Residential Allocation Program. The City Attorney advised he would report back on this matter. After discussion, it was moved by Mayor Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Council allow all those developments that have received approval for phased development to reapply at the end of every RAP year for the next increment of phasing not to exceed 50 units and that points be allocated based upon their past application under RAP for that development. The roll call vote was as+follows: AYES: Councilmember Kephart and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmembers Butler and Mohr ABSENT: Councilmember Wood It was moved by Mayor Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that an applicant who has received phased development approval be allowed to reapply at the end of the firstRAP year for the next increment of 50 units but no points be allocated from the previous development. The rollcallvotewas as follows: AYES: Councilmember Kephart and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmembers Butler and Mohr ABSENT: Councilmember Wood Council discussion ensued regarding increasing the number of units in phasing. It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that Council ir_itiate an ordinance to increase the number of units in phased projects by 100 units out of the total of 500 units, making a maximum total of 250 units for phased projects. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Wood Council discussion ensued regarding lower-income housing set-aside. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, that Council initiate an ordinance to increase the size of non-multi-year projects from 50 to 80 units per year. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, and Mayor Mercer '- NOES: Councilmember Mohr ABSENT: Councilmember Wood 6. 9/16/80