CCMIN081280 - Laserfiche WebLink

On the ba~i~ of an .Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the projec~ the Director of Planning and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial .S..t.udy is available for review at the Planning Division,. 200. Bernal Avenue~..Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Planning staff prior to the above meetin8 dates or .directly to ~he city council at the above noticed meeting Mayor Mercer explained that the State had not approved the City's Housing Element as submitted stating that it did not contain enough quantitative material. Mayor Mercer suggested this item be continued until after approval is received from the State on the City's Housing Element. Council concurred. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing Open on the review of the draft revised Housing Element of the General Plan of the City of Pleasanton formulated pursuant to State Government Code Section 65302 and State Housing Element Guidelines and accom- panying Negative Declaration, and continued this item to the meeting of August 26, 1980, 8:00 P.M., at the Fairgrounds Cafeteria. CoUnty Referral - Nellsen Ranch General Plan Amendment Mr. Harris presented his report dated August 5, 1980, regarding this matter. Mr. George Allen, of William J. Black and Associates Engineers, representing Mr. Nellsen, presented a brief background regarding this parcel of property which is located in the west hill area of Dublin. Mr. Allen stated his client desired to have this property rezoned from Agriculture to Residential in order to develop residential, adding that he already had 150 sewer permits. Council questioned why the City would be involved in this referral since the property is in the San Ramon area. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that staff be instructed to advise Alameda County Planning Commission that the City Council is neither in favor of or in opposition to the General PlanAmendment application of Mr. Nellsen, and feel he should have the right to determine the future of his property. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Counc~!members Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSEnt: None MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION AdOption of OrdinanCe No. 936,...regulating Cond0~inipm Conversions i9 the .City Of Pleasanton (Introduced 5-.~7-80, 5-A~s) (Contd. from 6-24-80 and 7-8-80) The City Attorney presented Ordinance No. 936, which would limit the number of apartments that could be sold individually as condominiums to the number of new apartment units built each year. Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 936, was introduced on May 27, 1980, by a vote of 5-Ayes, and adoption of the ordinance continued from the meeting of June 24, 1980, and July 8, 1980. 6. 8/12/8o