My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN061080
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
CCMIN061080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:51:51 AM
Creation date
11/11/1999 12:02:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d. Adoption of Ordinance No. 935, relating to "radioactive materials uses" amending <br /> Section 2-5.27, Article 2 (Definitions); Subsection 2-7.08(a) (Permitted and Con- <br /> ditional Uses), Article 8 ("C" Commercial Districts); and Section 2-7.21 (Condi- <br /> tional Uses), Article 9 ("I" Industrial Districts) of Chapter 2 (Zoning), Title <br /> II (Zoning and Development) of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> e. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-151, after review of bids, awarding contract for <br /> the improvement of West Angela at Western Pacific Railroad and Angela at Southern <br /> Pacific Transportation Company, Project No. 79-2, to Eugene G. Alves Construction <br /> Company, Inc., in the amount of $135,574.50, and authorizing the appropriate City <br /> officials to execute the agreement. <br /> <br /> f. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-152, approving Program Supplement No. 13 to Local <br /> Agency-State Agreement No. 04-5101 for Federal Aid Improvements, for the instal- <br /> lation of automatic gates at Bernal Avenue at Western Pacific Railroad, and <br /> authorizing execution by the appropriate City officials. <br /> <br />g. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-153, accepting public improvements in Tract 3889, <br /> Mission Park Unit 6, and authorizing the City Attorney to file Notice of Com- <br /> pletion. <br /> <br />h. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-154, "authorizing the Mayor to sign a letter to <br /> be sent to the Board of Supervisors stating that the City does not object to <br /> the rezoning of 15.2 acres of land on Vineyard Avenue in the County approxi- <br /> mately .2 of a mile outside of the Pleasanton City limit boundary", said pro- <br /> perty owned by Lewis C. Nevis. <br /> <br /> i. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-155, approving Final Map and Improvement Plans for <br /> Tract 4239, Twelve Oaks Unit No. 1, Joseph E. Boatright and Raymond H. Goodrich, <br /> and authorization to sign Subdivision Agreement by the appropriate City officials. <br /> <br />j. Adoption of Resolution No. 80-156, approving the filing of an application with <br /> the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for reimbursement of allocated funds <br /> in the amount of $19,152.00 for construction of a bicycle path on Santa Rite Road, <br /> and construction of a bicycle path along a portion of Stoneridge Drive near Denker. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />~TTERS INITIATED BY COUNCILMEMBERS <br /> Councilmember Wood asked the Director of Planning to give his opinion regarding <br />the priority of the completion of Bernal Avenue, the completion of Peters Avenue, <br />and the completion of Pico Avenue from Vineyard to Stanley. Mr. Harris stated that <br />based on land use instead of traffic engineering he felt the completion of Pico <br />Avenue extension and Peters Avenue were more important than the Bernal Avenue com- <br />pletion. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kephart advised that Livermore City Council had taken a position <br />in opposition to the proposed water slide at Shadow Cliffs Park. He stated he felt <br />Pleasanton City Council should take a position on this matter. Councilmember Kep- <br />hart stated that after review of the Environmental Impact Report he was opposed to <br />the project mainly because of the traffic problem it will cause and its adverse <br />effect on the environment. He added he was not opposed to the project but to its <br />proposed location. <br /> <br /> 2. 6/10/80 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.