CCMIN012280 - Laserfiche WebLink

75 79-02 ~Iission Park Inv.~ PUD-77-10 Councilmember Kephart stated he felt this project meritee 64 points. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Mayor Brandes, that this project at awarded 78 points, with 15 points allocated for Dolores Drive as a Missing Link. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilman Mercer and Mayor Brandes NOES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, and Wood ABSEnt: None After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded-by Councilmember Wood, that 79-02 Mission Park Investors, PUD-77-10, be awarded a total of 64 points, the staff recommendation plus an extra point for Design. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, and Wood NOES: Councilman Mercer and Mayor Brandes ABSENT: None 79-03 Wilson~ PUD-79-4 It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that 79-03 Wilson, PUD-79-4, be awarded a total of 52 points, as shown in the staff recom- mendation. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: Councilman Mercer ABSENT: None Councilmember Mercer stated he felt Design should receive 2 additional points. 79-05 Northwood t{omes~ Oak .Hill Councilmember Mercer stated he felt this project should receive 40 points. Councilmember Butler stated he felt it should receive 39 points. After discussion, it was moved by Mayor Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that 79-05 Northwood Homes, Oak Hill, be awarded a total of 41 points, as shown in the staff recommendation plus an extra point for Design. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmen Butler, Kephart, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None 79-06 Crocker Home. S~. Parkside It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that this project receive a total of 65 points. Councilmember Butler stated he could not support his. He re-emphasized the traffic circulation. He stated he felt this project should receive an additional 3 points for In-kind Services; 2 points for the tennis courts, and 1 point for the increase in cost of the access road. Councilmember ~ercer stated he felt In-kind Services should receive 6 points; 3 points for the tennis courts which had to be moved at the request of the Park and Recreation Commission, and 3 points for the additional right-of-way required by the City for the street, making a total of 76 points for this project. 6. 1/22/80