CCMIN011580 - Laserfiche WebLink

should account for 95% of the Design points when reviewing a subdivision such as · the one proposed by Ponderosa Homes, and requested that an additional 8 points be allocated to this category. Mr. Angrisani questioned staff's recommendation that their Traffic Circulation points be reduced because the alternate route to the freeway is "outof the way", and stronSly objected to the use of the proposed Las Positas interchange as their planned freeway route. This interchange does not exist and if the State's plans are approved as nresently propDsed, will not exist. He stated this hold true for the proposed Stoneridge Drive interchange also, therefore, submitted that the closest interchanges to this project are Bernal Avenue at 1-680 and Hopyard Road at 1-580. Mr. Angrisani.stated that since the interchanges are approximately equi- distant from the subdivision, he felt that the routes to either interchange could be considered as their planned route and this being the case, with the Hopyard - 1-580 route being 90% completed, that this project should receive 4 points for the freeway route rather than the 1 point originally awarded. Mayor Brandes recessed the meeting at 8:50 P.M. Mayor Brandes reconvened the meeting at 9:00 P.M. 79-12 Elliot~,.Tract 3187 Mr. Doyle Heaton, representing Vintage Hills Limited, who purchased this pro- perty from H. C. Elliott, stated this development consisted of 16 lots at the corner of Fairlands, fully improved with curb, sidewalks and gutter, that sewer permits were allocated and paid for, and that he intended to build medium/high income housing with 1,600-2,000 sq. ft. homes. He requested that this project receive points that would allow him to complete the project. He asked what would happen to the 16 sewer permits if he did not receive RAP approval to finish this develop- ment. Staff advised that he could get an extension time on his sewer permits because of governmental action. Mr. Heaton requested that this information be furnished to him in writing. 79-7 El!iott, Vintag.e Hills Commons Mr. Doyle Heaton, representing Vintage Hills Limited, who purchased this pro- perty from H. C. Elliott, stated that the shopping center had been approved ~ith the condition that the townhouses proposed behind this center would not be started until construction had begun on the shopping center. He stated that the shopping center was now a fact, that a portion had been opened and the remaining shops would soon be occupied. He stated that the widening of Tawny Road would be started as soon as weather permitted. Mr. Heaton stated he felt the townhouse project should receive sufficient points for completion since they were approved as a part of the shopping center and were meant to be built. He stated he felt this should be considered in-filling and it was not logical that construction should not be completed on this project. Mr. Heaton added that this was the same project as presented last year and now it was at the bottom of the list for points, which he did not feel was fair. 79-13 Centex Homes~ PUD-79-11 Mr. Bob Douglas, M & M Consultants, representing Centex Homes, stated he was pleased that this project ranked third overall in the staff report and first in the category of design. He stated there were, however, three areas of concern. First, the issue of large lots. He stated the smallest lot is 9,000 square feet and average lot size is 15,000 square feet and the largest lots range up to over 20,000 square feet in size. Despite this, this category only received 2 points, which he felt was conservative. 3. 1/15/80