My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN042881
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CCMIN042881
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:52:02 AM
Creation date
11/10/1999 11:33:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
233 <br /> <br /> completion shall be determined by the City Engineer with appeal directly to City <br /> Council". <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated he is very impressed with the integrity of Mr. Meyer <br /> and the high quality of his proposed project, but he could not vote for any pro- <br /> posal with buildings more than 3 stories in height. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kephart stated this type of use is consistent with our General <br /> Plan; staff has recommended approval as well as the Planning COmmission; that the <br /> police and fire department concerns have been satisfied; and the contributions by - <br /> the developer to the City are beneficial, thus he is in favor of this project. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated he is in favor of the 5 story height limitation <br /> and feels this proposal meets the criteria of the General Plan and will be a <br /> strong asset to the City. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, <br />that Ordinance No. 973, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, <br />approving Case PUD-80-16, application of Meyer Properties, Inc., for planned unit <br />development (Industrial and Commercial) zoning and development plan approval for an <br />approximately 82 acre site located at the northwest corner of Hopyard Road and <br />Stoneridge Drive, subject to Planning Commission conditions and Council amendments <br />thereto, be introduced. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: CouW~ilmembers BUtler, Kephart, and Mohr <br />NOES: Councilmember Wood and Mayor Mercer <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer recessed the meeting at 10:35 P.M. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer reconvened the meeting at 10:45 P.M. <br /> <br />Application of the Plannin~ Commission of the City of Pleasanton to prezone the <br />.approximately 41 acre area located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue immediately <br />east of the Hacienda Mobile Home Park to PUD Medium Density Residentia~ District, <br />RM-4000 (Multiple Family Residential).Distr.~t~ or any other zoninM. d~str. ict con- <br />sistent with the General Plan <br /> <br />On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the <br />project, the Director of Planning and Community Development hasJdetermined that <br />the proposed p~oject would ~ot ha~e any potential'sig~ifi'cant adverse effects' on <br />the environment and that an environmental impa~ report need not be prepar'ed. This <br />Initia! Study is available for review at the Planning. Division, '200 Bernal'Avenue, <br />Pleasanton. Comments on thiS"decision may be d~rected to either the Planning staf~ <br />prior to the above meeting date, or directly to the City Council at t~& above <br />noticed meeting <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item and continued to the <br />meeting of May 12, 1981, 8:00 P.M., Fairgrounds Cafeteria, at the request of Mr. <br />William Hirst, Attorney, per his letter dated April 28, 1981. <br /> <br /> 9. 4/28/81 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.