My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN122281
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CCMIN122281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:52:02 AM
Creation date
11/10/1999 11:16:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. Adoption of Ordinance No. 1010, approving the application of Frank Auf der Maur <br /> et al, to rezone an approximately 73 acre site located between Stanley Boulevard <br /> on the north and the Arroyo del Valle on the south from the intersection of Stan- <br /> ley Boulevard and California Street to a point approximately 2000 feet east of <br /> that intersection to the Planned Unit Development-Commercial District. <br /> <br /> c. Adoption of Resolution No. 81-430, authorizing the City to purchase equipment and <br /> supplies from the Department of General Services of the State of California. <br /> <br />d. Adoption of Resolution No. 81-431, approving the hiring of one additional building <br /> inspector and amending the Fiscal Year 1981-82 budget accordingly. <br /> <br /> e. Adoption of Resolution No. 81-432, accepting a 10 ft. wide public service easement <br /> for Storm Drainage purposes from Auburn Properties, and authorizing the CityMana- <br /> ger to prepare a Certificate of Acceptance in order that said documents can be <br /> recorded by the County Recorder's office. <br /> <br />f. Adoption of Resolution No. 81-433, acceptance of Tract No. 4166 - Stanley Commer- <br /> cial Park, Unit No. 2. <br /> <br />g. Adoption of Resolution No. 81-434, acceptance of Tract No. 4401, Stanley Commer- <br /> cial Park, Unit No. 3. <br /> <br />h. Adoption of Resolution No. 81-435, authorizing staff to proceed with the adver- <br /> tisement calling for bids on the one MGD expansion of the LAVWMA facility. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows:' <br /> AYES: Councilmembers B~tler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Councilmember Kephart <br /> <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCILMEMBERS <br /> Further Discussion of RAP and Affordable Housing <br /> Mayor Mercer presented his report dated December 17, 1981, regarding this matter, <br /> stating that he had requested the staff to assist him in preparing for Council this <br /> report regarding the confusing subject of affordable housing and growth management. <br /> Because of the overlap of several Council programs and the growth management changes, <br /> confusion has resulted which should be cleared up before looking at the large number <br /> of affordable housing units currently being proposed. He stated that Council approved, <br /> on November 24, 1981, the staff's report (with some modifications) for replacing the <br /> Residential Allocation Program (RAP) with a new growth management program. Council <br /> also approved on November 24, 1981, Ordinance No. 1006, designed to exempt those <br /> affordable housing projects which enter into agreements with the City for partici- <br /> pation in the mortgage revenue bond program. Mayor Mercer stated that on August 25, <br /> 1981, Council approved Resolution No. 81-287, which set up an affordable housing com- <br /> petition which would have exempted approximately 200 units in its first year from the <br /> growth management controls as a part of an affordable housing competition. Mayor <br /> Mercer stated there are a number of questions that need to be answered, and that it <br /> is now in order to receive testimony from developers, then to receive input from the <br /> Council, in order to formulate the growth management plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ed Pettish, developer of the proposed Quail Creek low income and affordable <br /> housing on Vineyard Avenue, stated he is pleased with the progress of this project <br /> and the cooperation of staff and Planning Commission, as well as the homeowners asso- <br /> ciations in the area for favorable reaction to this proposal. He stated he had re- <br /> quested continuance of his item because he felt that the Planning Commission needs <br /> further direction from the City Council on the growth management plan, and that it <br /> is critical that the City Council make these decisions tonight. He reviewed the time <br /> <br /> 2.. 12/22/81 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.