CCMIN120881 - Laserfiche WebLink

ance that there will not be a lot of additional conditions put on individual permits or off-site improvement costs will make a burden on this property. He stated this is one of the most costly projects in the nation and that additional costs could be a real problem for developers. He requested City Council assurance that there be some limits for additional off-site costs laid on this property. Ms. MarilynMoorish, representing Kaiser/Permanente, asked Council to consider a cap on additional costs for improvements. She added this is the largest undertaking ever done in California, and she felt that any future costs, at least on fire, water, and traffic, should not have to be borne by the developer. She stated that Kaiser/ Permanente is developing for the needs of the community and their project will not stimulate growth. Mr. David Martin, partner with CPS Associates, stated he sympathized with Rey- nolds and Brown, and Kaiser/Permanente, to get an estimate on the dollar amount of improvements, but he felt it is premature for his firm to support this position. He stated there are two issues involved: (1) if assessment on property reaches a limit that would be burdensome to property owners there is a limit to the fair market price of property, or market cap; and (2) the City has always retained the right to reassess property. Mr. Martin stated that at some future time we will be at a point to be in position to define that limit but he did not feel that it could be done now. He concluded by stating he would like to see the North Pleasanton area developed to its maximum potential. Mr. Martin stated he supports staff recommendation that a limit not be put on improvement costs at this time. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded byCouncil- member Kephart, that Resolution No. 81-428, approving the mitigating measures agree- ment between the City of Pleasanton and Reynolds and Brown as recommended by the City Attorney, and authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute the agreement, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Resolution No. 81-429, approving the mitigating measures agreement between the City of Pleasanton and Kaiser/Permanents as recommended by the City Attorney, and authorizing the appropriate City officials to execute the agreement, be adopted.. The roll cal. 1 vote .was ap fol.~gws: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: 'None ABSENT: None The City Attorney asked for authorization to continue to negotiate agreements with developers, accepting the City's basic form and format, without further Council approval. Council determined that they should be included in any decisions of this magnitude, and instructed that all mitigating measures agreements be brought to them for consideration and decision. Mr. Paul Carlson, representing Lee Sammis Company, stated that if this firm could work something out with the City they would like the same format aS the above developers. Council concurred. COMMUNICATIONS. There were no Communications presented at this meeting.